User talk:Freeformer

This user may have left Wikipedia. Freeformer has not edited Wikipedia since March 14, 2011. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, Freeformer, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --Ragib 18:01, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Welcome and newbi question

Hi, thanks for your message. A stub becomes an article as it gets up to a reasonable size. There is no hard and fast rules regarding the size ... but in general, an article with about a pageful of content should not be left as a stub. If you feel an article is more or less satisfactorily long enough, you are free to remove the stub message.

To propose a move, you should first initiate a discussion in the talk page of the corresponding article.

Thanks. --Ragib 22:14, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Remark

Hi. Just a request. It is good to put an edit summary, even for minor edits if your changes are subtle and not obvious, and definitely for big edits. It helps people who have a given article on the watchlist to understand what you are up to. Think of it as the "Subject" line in an email. Thanks a lot, Oleg Alexandrov 20:56, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Neat article

Freeform surface modelling. Gives good insight and has cool dynamic image. -thanks, Onceler 21:12, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NURBS Picture

Thanks for finding a picture. That was quick. —BenFrantzDale 20:48, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask you what application you used to actually animage that image? 89.240.165.229 19:36, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was a Camtasia screen record of NX (Unigraphics) then edited (to make smaller) in Jasc Animation Shop.

Thanks muchly. Kyle McInnes (talk) 16:19, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from me as well, it's an excellent animated gif. Todd (talk) 13:03, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CAD companies

Logic of deletion in List of CAD companies: The same logic as in all lists in wikipedia: to be listed, must have a wikipedia article. There have been thousands of companies that call themselves CAD companies, with two hundred of them folding yearly. The cornerstones for wikipedia inclusion are notability and verifiability. Wikipedia is not Yellow Pages. I left only companies that have articles either about themselves or about some of their products. mikka (t) 17:51, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Please don't forget to sign your posts; see top of your talk page. mikka (t) 17:51, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Spoon sh.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Spoon sh.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Stan 23:45, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Freeform1.gif

Hello there, I really like this animation. I've nominated it for selected picture at the architecture portal, and placed it on my talk page. Hope you don't mind :-). Looking through some of your other uploads, I like this especially because it doesn't show the application tool-boxes (because I know what those look like already). Do you mind if I upload this to the Commons, Wikipedia's shared image repository? Regards, DVD+ R/W 21:44, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to know the image is liked. No problem about where it is used, it was uploaded to wiki for general use.

These animations are really cool. Do you take requests? I have a few if you don't mind. Can you make a higher res version of Freeform1 without the pixelated / noisy background? And, can you make one that shows lofting (or sweeping?) between two contours? Also, can you make one that shows a transformation of a solid rather than a surface? Regards, DVD+ R/W 18:22, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Blend1a.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Blend1a.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:06, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Your uploads

Hey I notice you have uploaded a fair number of images which you tagged as GFDL. As an example, Image:NX4.png is NOT your work to release under the GFDL or any other free license. That is a screenshot of a copyrighted program (NX (Unigraphics)). As such, it is protected by the softwares copyright and should correctly be tagged with {{software-screenshot}}. See the wording of that template and Wikipedia:Fair use for a greater understanding of this. Also, the animations of you using this software, whilst highly informative again are probably an infringement of the companies copyright. Thanks, if you have any queries feel free to ask me.--Nilfanion (talk) 21:12, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Although the software is copyrighted so it cannot be used without paying a fee to the owner I see these images as fair use. I have a legal license for NX and the software used to create the images (Camtasia and Paint Shop Pro). It is possible that the icons and user interface of the software are copyrighted but the screen shots are of a very small size that I see no problem with them. The geometry is created by me and are not real world copyrighted parts. I have updated the text for the image you referenced; do you see this as an acceptable licensing statement? Freeformer 06:08, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use seems fine to me with the screenshot ones that include the interface. The ones without the toolboxes etc. I think are fine as GFDL. Just what I think, DVD+ R/W 17:04, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alias v/s Autodesk

Hi FreeFormer,

Regarding the Computer-aided_industrial_design page, if this is the product you meant, AliasStudio is the correct name. The old version of the page was talking about a generic Alias product and usually "the Alias product" is Maya. Now, as you know, Alias doesn't exist anymore and the only trace left is in the name of the StudioTools product now called AliasStudio.

Regarding the classification of Industrial Design as PLM, I still disagree. None of the product for PLM includes an ID or CAID module. ID is part of the product lifecycle, the same way welding, or marketing are part of it, but not part of any PLM system.

My suggestion is to remove the category.

--Folini 15:57, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi Folini,

For product design most people I know simply use the term Alias for the software package from the company that used to be called Alias. Although Maya was also from the same company I have not seen it often used for product design. Maybe Maya should however also be mentioned along side AliasStudio in the CAID article.

On the topic of PLM category. PLM is term for the tools and methods for developing and manufacturing products. It is not just data management software such as PDM but also geometry creation tools such as CAD,CAM,CAE and I also would say CAID, PLM is not a single software system. Should we move this discussion over to the PLM talk page, see what others think? Freeformer 17:59, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

moved image

Hi, could you explain what the entry in Image:Spline01.gif means? Also why is the use of this on Nonuniform rational B-spline not referenced in Links? Freeformer 20:19, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you refering to "This picture/multimedia file is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Image:Spline01.gif."? That means the image is now availabe to use for all Wikimedia projects. It appears the image is not used in the Nonuniform rational B-spline article so that's why it isn't listed. // Liftarn

Re : Deletion of SEscreenshot.png

Sorry. - Mailer Diablo 11:01, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion requested

A tag has been placed on Solid Edge, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Solid Edge is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Solid Edge saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. ElKevbo 17:48, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:NX4.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:NX4.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cad-fm01s.gif

Hi, I like your animation Image:Cad-fm01s.gif and would like to see it in the Wikimedia Commons, so it can be used also in other languages of Wikipedia. Would you mind to add it to the commons? --Master on EN (talk) 21:04, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, freeformer - please give your opinion here: Deletion request on commons --Master on EN (talk) 16:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of UGS Teamcenter

I have nominated UGS Teamcenter, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UGS Teamcenter. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. --Explodicle (talk) 16:10, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Cad crank.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Cad crank.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Cad crank.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sdrtirs (talk) 16:25, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:NX5.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:NX5.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:10, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Computer-aided manufacturing software

File:Cadproc1.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cadproc1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 07:57, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:SEscreenshot.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SEscreenshot.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:19, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Blend1.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Computer-aided quality assurance

The article Computer-aided quality assurance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced for years

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MB 07:49, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Motoryacht design s.png

The file File:Motoryacht design s.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Teamcenter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Teamcenter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teamcenter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

17387349L8764 (talk) 15:50, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Computer-aided quality assurance for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Computer-aided quality assurance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computer-aided quality assurance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

17387349L8764 (talk) 16:09, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]