User Talk:Freedoxm
| This is Freedoxm's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
 | This helps keep the discussion easily readable and in one place. |
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Freedoxm! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! AntiDionysius (talk) 23:02, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:28, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Freedoxm, the "500 edits and an account age of 30 days" restriction applies to internal discussions such as Special:Diff/1252133822 (requested moves, "RMs") too. See WP:ECR for details about this type of restriction. It used to be more explicit about this, but now simply everything except edit requests is prohibited, and participating in a discussion isn't making an edit request. This could be made less confusing, I guess, and I don't blame you for having been unaware of this. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:34, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for reminding me. I just saw the rule that says that you must be extended-protected to talk. 🗽Freedoxm🗽 (talk) 23:53, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Freedoxm, I understand your frustration and I am thankful for your message on my talk page; I'd even like to restore it if you allow me to. Seeing a page being technically editable, spending time on writing something constructive and having it reverted instantly is almost guaranteed to upset the writer, and I didn't mean to. Regarding opinions: Opinions on talk pages are a difficult topic in general, not just for the Arab-Israeli conflict or other formally contentious topics. You did a good job at focusing on the Wikipedia-side of the issue and on the content itself. Others have more difficulty in distinguishing between their personal opinion about a conflict and what an encyclopedia should contain about it. In extreme cases, even normally-allowed comments are removed for using Wikipedia as a discussion forum or even using Wikipedia as a battleground. So I wouldn't worry too much about the revert if possible; it's the least severe reason for which a comment could be removed at all. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:01, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- thanks, but there is no need to restore it 🗽Freedoxm🗽 (talk) 00:01, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, no problem. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:03, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- thanks, but there is no need to restore it 🗽Freedoxm🗽 (talk) 00:01, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Freedoxm, I understand your frustration and I am thankful for your message on my talk page; I'd even like to restore it if you allow me to. Seeing a page being technically editable, spending time on writing something constructive and having it reverted instantly is almost guaranteed to upset the writer, and I didn't mean to. Regarding opinions: Opinions on talk pages are a difficult topic in general, not just for the Arab-Israeli conflict or other formally contentious topics. You did a good job at focusing on the Wikipedia-side of the issue and on the content itself. Others have more difficulty in distinguishing between their personal opinion about a conflict and what an encyclopedia should contain about it. In extreme cases, even normally-allowed comments are removed for using Wikipedia as a discussion forum or even using Wikipedia as a battleground. So I wouldn't worry too much about the revert if possible; it's the least severe reason for which a comment could be removed at all. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:01, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for reminding me. I just saw the rule that says that you must be extended-protected to talk. 🗽Freedoxm🗽 (talk) 23:53, 19 October 2024 (UTC)