User talk:Freedom42986

December 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hillel International. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. If you think something is too broken to be fixed, then write your changes and substitute that in its place instead of removing the chunk. By removing chunks of content from Wikipedia, you're removing the work of many editors who have most likely spent more time than you in improving the page. Nuking content, especially when it is sourced, is not the solution to "broken" sections. Chlod (say hi!) 08:48, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to this, if you find the sources to be unverifiable, then remove it with that notion instead of a canned "broken". Better yet, discuss why the section or its sources cannot remain on Wikipedia on the article talk page. Chlod (say hi!) 08:50, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]