User talk:Free2brag

my talk page

comments welcome--Free2brag (talk) 16:44, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion with Praline97 about his/her removals of my Federer & Djokovic edits

Free2brag, I took down your obtrusive footnotes to Federer's Singles Performance Timeline because they ruin the visual layout of the table with unnecessary information. If you want to do it on Djokovic's page that is fine, but your activity constitutes vandalism much more than my preservation of Federer's timeline.

Above comment was written by Praline97 (talk) at 00:39:50 & 00:40:15 on 9 August 2012 (UTC), in response to questions I asked in this section of Praline97's talk page. (My two questions are repeated below.) Free2brag (talk) 16:13, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have twice removed my edit of this section, with no explanation. Please let me know what you consider the problem to be. Thanks. Free2brag (talk) 06:25, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(No apparent response from Praline97). I now notice that you have removed my similar edit of the Novak Djokovic article. From my point of view, this seems highly inappropriate. If you consider what you are doing to not be vandalism, please respond to my requests for a discussion. For example: Do you think that I am adding too much material to already-quite-long articles? If so, we could discuss that here: Talk:Roger Federer career statistics#Page size problem. Do you object to the wording of the footnotes? Do you object to the references I chose? Let's discuss this. Thanks Free2brag (talk) 18:15, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

djokovic FO walkover

Hey, thanks for the comments. I still think the reference to the W/O for Novak's FO 2011 is too unimportant to mention in a table like this, and exactly for the reason you used to say the opposite :) - it happens a few times a year, with several players, so it would be weird to mention it all the time (Federer has had it 4 times in his GS career for example), and the fact that there was a W/O can be seen exactly by looking at the numbers - since it says 25-1 instead of 26-1 what should have been for three wins and a semi, you can tell that there must have been one W/O.

Therefore i just thought it was redundant info, that blurred the table a bit. Obviously if you disagree, you could change it back - i don't have strong feelings about it :). But i will still disagree with you if you do...

By the way, i'm an editor at a fairly new tennis page, called Tennis Records Open Era (Singles Men). I created it as a better alternative for the ATP World Tour Records page, since they have this strange cut-off year of 1972 instead of 1968. Always nice to have new readers/editors over there. Cheers Kendu020 (talk) 16:20, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Quasqueton, Iowa may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

</ref>) Radio DJ, member of the [[National Radio Hall of Fame]] and [[National Association of Broadcasters

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:33, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks BracketBot; I fixed it. Free2brag (talk) 22:24, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jelena Janković, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2014 US Open. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks DPL WikiProject; I fixed it.Free2brag (talk) 16:50, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Free2brag. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Free2brag. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]