User talk:Freddy Krueger

Warnings

February 2007

Thank you for experimenting with the page Freddy Krueger on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. BIGNOLE (Question?) (What I do) 23:18, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not introduce any form of vandalism to the userpages of other users, as you did to User talk:Bignole. Thank you. BIGNOLE (Question?) (What I do) 23:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Rod Lane, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --NMChico24 00:07, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to A Nightmare on Elm Street 4: The Dream Master, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --NMChico24 00:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Stop vandalising Freddy Krueger! Brain40
Quit vandalising. You will be banned as said above. Brain40

Blocked

It has become apparent that your account is only being used for vandalism, so it has been blocked indefinitely.

NMChico24 01:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Experience finding speedy candidates is good for adminship; but so is experience, in articles and project pages (WP:AFD, WP:RFA, etc.). Cheers, CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 05:56, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Freddy, what's with the cheesy "Freddy Krueger" sterotype? Anyway, how come this site can't be a safe place to talk with friends and work on homework for their Lit and Comp class for which they are trying to do research for?

P.S. How do you make it so you can't delete something? I think its pretty cool... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chiefsfan364 (talk • contribs)

WM23

Because it is against notability policy of WikiProject Professional wrestling and Wikipedia itself. I should warn you that administration will block you for violating the Three Revert Rule. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak_Sign 23:29, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

True, but a case like this would't be one of the rare exceptions as editorial consensus is that the information is just cruft. If you really wanted that information left in then I would suggest beginning a new discussion at Talk:WrestleMania 23 and coming up with a good case. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak_Sign 23:37, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually WP:PW members have been removing stuff like that and other unnecessary additions fairly frequently (given there's been about 300 edits on the page in the last 24 hours). As I say, the best way of getting any information of disputed importance into an article is by discussing it on the article's talk page and seeing what everyone thinks there. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak_Sign 23:49, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lemony Snicket task force

Hello, Freddy Krueger and thank you for your contributions on articles related to the works of Lemony Snicket. I'd like to invite you to become a member of the Lemony Snicket task force, a task force aiming to improve coverage of Lemony Snicket and related articles on Wikipedia.

If you would like to help out and participate, please visit the task force page for more information. Thanks! — The Man in Question (gesprec) · (forðung) 06:38, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]