User talk:FreddyFred

WELCOME TO WIKIPEDYA!!!!!!!!!

I KISS YOU!!!

Alahu Akbar!

Promotion Picture Deleted From Article About .475 Wildey Magnum

Is it any way to get me back that picture? It was posted with out my knowledege that it diden't have a tag. The right tag should have been promotion material. Please, tell me that it's not gone forever. Because I cant find it again, ANYWHERE! And program that robot to give a warning one the main article page, and not only if you click the picture (wich a basically never did!).....Thankxxxx FreddyFred 00:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The image was deleted for not having source information. Without that, it's not possible to verify the copyright status, and the image can't be used on Wikipedia. The bot did notify the uploader, User:ChuckyDarko, and when it removed the image from the article, you still had three days to fix the problems with it before it was deleted. --Carnildo 07:31, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gävle goat

Chill, I didn't put it up for deletion, someone else did. Have your say instead of yelling at me. -O bli (Talk)^? 12:11, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can only offer my sincerest apologies - I had genuinely never heard of the Gävle Goat. However, like you said, no harm was done so in that respect I guess it's a happy ending. - Blood red sandman 15:24, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article: [1] says it costs 70,000-100,000 SEK - where does the 150,000 figure come from? Good work btw.Yomangani ^talk 10:49, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not a good idea to revert me -- or to post youtube videos and have me find them. Danny 00:21, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Danny's behaviour here, including what xe wrote above, has been reprehensible. It falls to me to explain what Danny could and should have explained in a manual edit summary right at the start, instead of abusing administrator tools to edit and then to edit war. The problem is the YouTube link. External links to YouTube are a subject of much discussion at Wikipedia talk:External links right now. The fundamental goal is not to externally link to things on the World Wide Web where someone's copyright has been violated. Music videos being posted on YouTube have been mentioned as a particularly common case of copyrights being violated. Uncle G 02:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gävle goat

Hi! No I do not know when it was burned, was abit surprised when I added the pictures that it did not seam to be mentioned in the article, I will find out and add it. God Jul och Gott Nytt År. Stefan 17:36, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Added with reference, can not find it online though .... Stefan 19:48, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:WildeyBronson.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:WildeyBronson.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:40, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Wildey survivor18.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wildey survivor18.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:WildeyBronson.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:WildeyBronson.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:50, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Wildey survivor18.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wildey survivor18.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:50, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Julbocken i Gavle listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Julbocken i Gavle. Since you had some involvement with the Julbocken i Gavle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 17:52, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Julbocken i Gävle listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Julbocken i Gävle. Since you had some involvement with the Julbocken i Gävle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 17:52, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gävlebocken listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gävlebocken. Since you had some involvement with the Gävlebocken redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 17:54, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gavlebocken listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gavlebocken. Since you had some involvement with the Gavlebocken redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 17:54, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gavle bocken listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gavle bocken. Since you had some involvement with the Gavle bocken redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 17:54, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gävle bocken listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gävle bocken. Since you had some involvement with the Gävle bocken redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 17:54, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gavlegoat listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gavlegoat. Since you had some involvement with the Gavlegoat redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 17:56, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contact

Hey Freddy, we know each other from New Mexico and I wonder what you’re up to every time I visit. If you still check here or get email alerts, send me an email sometime. - StJohn57 (talk) 15:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]