User talk:Freddiebrown90

October 2018

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kray twins have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Materialscientist (talk) 09:46, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Lenny McLean

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Lenny McLean, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 09:48, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Clerkenwell crime syndicate. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Clerkenwell crime syndicate was changed by Freddiebrown90 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958765 on 2018-10-14T09:48:54+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:48, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lenny McLean, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Lenny McLean was changed by Freddiebrown90 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861313 on 2018-10-14T16:18:32+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:18, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kray twins.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Kray twins was changed by Freddiebrown90 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.887979 on 2018-10-14T16:24:48+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:24, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Clerkenwell crime syndicate has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Clerkenwell crime syndicate was changed by Freddiebrown90 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952537 on 2018-11-18T20:56:20+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:56, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Clerkenwell crime syndicate. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 19:58, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Clerkenwell crime syndicate, you may be blocked from editing. Nthep (talk) 21:46, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Nthep (talk) 18:10, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Freddiebrown90, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Nthep (talk) 18:10, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Devil. Philipnelson99 (talk) 19:00, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kinu ^t/_c 19:31, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]