User talk:Frazzle

Welcome.

Hello, Frazzle, and welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. -- Jeandré, 2007-12-04t11:45z

Frangela talk page

Why did you delete my question? I was genuinely hoping that someone had information that could answer my question but obviously no one can if my question is deleted for no apparent reason. If you do not explain why you removed my question from the Frangela talk page within the next couple days I will re-add it.-Schnurrbart (talk) 02:43, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I do not appreciate being called a vandal. My edit was on the talk page of the article, which is the appropriate place to discuss the article. I did not edit the article by making unsubstantiated claims, much less by vandalizing it. Second, asking about the relationship between the two members of Frangela is perfectly legitimate. A person's sexual orientation is an important part of their identity, much like their racial/ethnic background, religious beliefs, political convictions, etc. is so if this information is known there is no reason to censor it. I personally do not judge people because of their sexual orientation any more than I would judge someone based on race, religion, etc. so I see nothing 'wrong' with the women in Frangela if they are in fact gay. I was hoping that they may have disclosed the nature of their relationship in an interview or in some other way in the past and I wanted someone to provide this information (preferably with a source that could possibly be used in the article in the future). After seeing them in I'm a Celebrity…Get Me out of Here! (U.S. season 2), I thought that they seemed like they were a lesbian couple and was hoping to find out if this is the case or not by reading their Wikipedia article. However, this information was not in the article so I asked about their sexual orientation on the talk page of their article and you deleted my question. This leads me back to our disagreement. I think I have made a good case for why my question should be re-added to the talk page of the article and await your response. I would also like an apology for the accusations you made against me and my character.-Schnurrbart (talk) 00:12, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone here is a vandal, it is you. Maybe you don't like my question and consider it 'offensive' or whatever but different people have different opinions and I don't appreciate your attempt to censor me. I especially don't care for your contemptuous attitude towards me and your refusal to make an actual argument other than a vague claim of 'vandalism.' I am going to add my question again whether you like it or not.-Schnurrbart (talk) 05:41, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Screenshot From Tim Hagan's Facebook Page.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Screenshot From Tim Hagan's Facebook Page.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 00:02, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marcy Kaptur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard May. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Frazzle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Frazzle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]