User talk:Fraxs

Mohammad Hassan

Hello! I believe that the paragrath about the death of Mr. Mohammad Hassan should be in the K2 article. About 100 climbers walked by the body of Mr. Mohammad Hassan, but there are no articles about these climbers in the Wikipedia. Adding the paragraph in the Kristin Harila puts blame on her. This is not right. Kristin Harila has nothing to do with the death of Mr. Mohammad Hassan. He was not a member of her team. He was not an employee of the Seven Summit Treks. He died because his employer neglected safety standards. Please feel free to add the paragraph into the K2 article. Regards Szelma W (talk) 21:21, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy notice

You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally editors must be logged-in have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours for pages within this topic. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. The page which you recently edited and which comes under this rule is Judith Butler. Burrobert (talk) 11:49, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Burrobert does the edits in wp german count too? Fraxs (talk) 14:05, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually that is a good question to which I don't know the answer. You have more than enough edits on the German wiki. My guess is that the German edits do count but I will ask at one of the noticeboards and get back to you. If you find out in the meantime let me know. Burrobert (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I asked the question at the Village Pump. The answer was "Only edits on the English Wikipedia count towards the total". Burrobert (talk) 15:58, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

...which is correct. Hi Fraxs and Burrobert, the correct introduction template is {{subst:alert/first|a-i}}, which I will paste below mostly for formal reasons. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:24, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree so the language you mostly use is more important than the count of edits and the rest. in wp german it is similar. could be a rule to discuss about, sadly my english is far to bad for that. :) Fraxs (talk) 06:38, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

As soon as the requirements are met, your account will be automatically extended confirmed; you'll be notified when this happens.

As described in the blue box above, the clerks noticeboard is probably the best place to ask questions about these procedures.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:25, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This type of comment is unacceptable. In a contentious topic area, users must stick to discussing the material at issue and refrain from commenting on others. If you are unable to do that, you should find another topic area to edit it. If you persist, I will impose enforcement remedies. 331dot (talk) 11:48, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@331dot Do what you want, wp en has a massive antisemitic Problem. shame on you Fraxs (talk) 12:41, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 week. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.

331dot (talk) 12:45, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

I suggest that you consider carefully if this contentious topic area is something that you really want to participate in. If you do, then you must refrain from making attacks on other editors. The next step is likely longer blocks or a topic ban. 331dot (talk) 12:48, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

nie wieder Auschwitz du hurnsohn Fraxs (talk) 13:09, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. In addition, your ability to edit this talk page has also been revoked. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) then contact the Arbitration Committee through Special:EmailUser/Arbitration Committee (or, if your email access is revoked, to arbcom-en

wikimedia.org). You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.

331dot (talk) 13:14, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

I will restore your access to this page if you agree to stop making personal attacks. 331dot (talk) 13:15, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]