Jump to content

User talk:Viaros17

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Frasfras17)
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ibn al-Nafis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galenic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ibn al-Nafis, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Environment and Turkish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Pinkbeast (talk) 11:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your DRN Request

[edit]

Your DRN request was entered manually, and has been removed because dispute resolution requests should be entered using the template provided for the purpose. Not using the template causes the bot to become confused. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:26, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You requested an admin. Most of the volunteers at the noticeboard are not admins, and it is not necessary for the moderator to be an admin in order to mediate a dispute. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:27, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute Resolution Noticeboard

[edit]

Your posting at DRN was removed because it was done manually rather than clicking the "Request Dispute Resolution" button, answering the questions, and filling out the forms. Manually listing breaks DRN's automated listing and maintenance bot. A couple of tips:

  • The folks who work at DRN are not administrators.
  • They don't make judgments or decisions about articles. They only provide a venue for moderated discussion with a hope that the editors involved in a dispute can come to consensus.
  • Be sure to remember that if you file a case at DRN that it is your obligation to include all significant participants at the article talk page and that it is your obligation to notify them of the filing by putting a notice on their user talk page. A notice only at the article talk page will not suffice. There's a template noted at the top of the DRN page to make that a little easier.
  • Participation at DRN is voluntary, so if the other participants in the dispute don't care to join in at DRN then the case may be closed for insufficient participation.

Thanks for utilizing dispute resolution. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 17:29, 2 May 2018 (UTC) (Not watching this page)[reply]

Question

[edit]

Here you write: "My image is older and more historical one. Wikipedia rules favours historical images over modern illustrations."

Could you please point out me to where on Wikipedia this rule is? Thank you, Huldra (talk) 21:39, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Huldra, I am not quite sure, however, when I tried to add an image for Abbas ibn Firnas article here, my edit got reverted. From what I got, it was because the image being a random modern illustration. I might be wrong, so don't take my word for it.
Anyway regarding Alhazen article, i still think my image is more appropriate. An old historical image is much better then modern imaginary illustrations IMO. Viaros17 (talk) 11:19, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the problem is the one I mentioned here, try googling for Ibn Khaldun, Ibn al-Haytham or Ibn Tufail...and you get the exact same picture for all 3!! I believe it is the picture of Ibn al-Haytham, at least it is the exact picture that was on the Iraqi notes, and they (hopefully) did some research. Therefor I wanted it for the lead for the Ibn al-Haytham article (hopefully google will catch up one day...) Huldra (talk) 20:31, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Al-Zahrawi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Azahara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 23:11, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your uploaded photo

[edit]

I just noticed that you uploaded a fair use file, while I was here to state that there's no need for that (Al-Maari bust) since similar file is uploaded under creative commons license. However it appeared to be uploaded by you. You may want to ask for its deletion (I am afraid that you'll just leave it there!). And avoid doing that in the future. Nabataeus (talk) 21:57, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stamp of Al-Zarqali.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stamp of Al-Zarqali.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ziryab, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page African (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page edits

[edit]

Please could you refrain from constant fiddling edits to ancient talk page comments of your own? It doesn't contribute much, and is vexing to editors looking for new discussion. Of course where a significant error has been made it is fine to fix it, but what you're doing just generates a huge amount of watchlist spam. Pinkbeast (talk) 21:00, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

talk
OK, that was my last edit.
My English is not that good, that is why I usually re-edit my posts several times. Viaros17 (talk) 00:00, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Pinkbeast (talk) 03:17, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aladdin and Javiero Fernandez

[edit]

Hi - having a little bother with the above - I've been very patient (I think) but he's not letting up the tiniest bit. Noticed you've had some bother with him over One Thousand and One Nights and hoped you might like to butt in. No worries if you're not interested, of course. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 21:52, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Viaros17. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Al-Maʿarri bust2.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Al-Maʿarri bust2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Al-Jahiz-QatariStamp.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Al-Jahiz-QatariStamp.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]