User talk:Frank Fascarelli

First article I tried to edit was "MILF." I saw it being listed for deletion. I agree. Then I see others.

Hello? Frank Fascarelli (talk) 01:42, 15 August 2010 (UTC) ~ ~~ Frank Fascarelli (talk)[reply]

Cheek'd and others

Please be a little more careful and make sure to read relevant guidelines before going to overboard. Wikipedia:Notability. Also see WP:EL discussing external links. It is common to have the official link to the topic's website at the bottom of the article. You might be find m:Deletionism and m:Inclusionism interesting.Cptnono (talk) 02:07, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note..

Edit summaries like this are strongly discouraged via the no personal attacks policy, and blocks are usually given for offenders. You may want to read it. Thank you and welcome to Wikipedia. Tommy! [message] 02:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Frank Fascarelli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

evidence, anyone?

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Q ^{T C} 03:20, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Frank Fascarelli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand why I have been blocked.

Decline reason:

You're mass nominating articles for deletion and stalking/harassing User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ), not to mention posting similar unblock requests as the previously-blocked socks. Nice try, Torkmann. –MuZemike 03:33, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Frank Fascarelli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey, all I'm trying to do is clean up Wikipedia a bit. Sometimes one has to separate the wheat from the proverbial chaff. I might be blocked indef (not banned however) -- But just wait, I'm going to move to Côte d'Ivoire where my IP cannot be traced, make a bunch of legit edits, become an administrator, and ban that ass-hat Richard Norton from Wikipedia forever! His articles are total bollocks!

Decline reason:

Sorry, but this is abuse of the unblock template. Your block parameters will be changed to deny you access to your talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 03:46, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.