Jump to content

User talk:FrankEldonDixon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability guidelines for organizations

[edit]

Hello, Frank--

You created several new pages about organizations. You may want to check out the relevant notability guidelines. Cheers, JChap2007 20:58, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Gaels

[edit]

Thanks for the changes in the Golden Gaels article: I didn't modify anything in the first paragraph in my edit, so I missed the capitalization errors that were already there. Also, thanks for fixing my "dcan" typo! - RogueNine

Edit summary

[edit]

I have noted that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! -SpuriousQ 18:35, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chess biographies

[edit]

Thanks for your nice work on chess bios. It's much appreciated. 24.177.112.146 07:34, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded! Just read the article on Reuben Fine and added a couple of cites. Nevadaone (talk) 19:51, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References / Citations

[edit]

Hi Frank. I really appreciate the excellent work you've done in chess-related articles. But please use citations or references wherever possible, especially for little-known facts (like your recent comment that Botvinnik largely devised the FIDE cycle system), or things that could reasonably be called matters of opinion (like the comments Bronstein's opening repertoire). I can be a hard habit to get into but believe me, it helps in the long run. At least once I've had to go an deleted a "fact" I inserted because I couldn't find the reference. Also there's a lot of "facts" on Wikipedia which are just plain wrong; adding citations helps checkers to verify or ascertain stuff. Rocksong 03:51, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rocksong!! I wish I was in Australia right now; it is in the middle of the Canadian winter. Thanks for the kind words; they are appreciated. The information about Botvinnik's influence on the FIDE World Championship cycle design is mostly from Bronstein's book "The Sorcerer's Apprentice". Botvinnik was not only a world-class player, but he was the favourite of the Soviet chess establishment, and he had a huge amount of influence. This became clear from the early 1940s, when Botvinnik played badly in the 1940 Soviet Championship, yet was able to get a new tournament organized for the top players, the 1941 Absolute Championship, which he won. Botvinnik was seen as the best hope to claim the World Championship for the Soviet Union; the world champion at that time, Alexander Alekhine, was of course a renegade Russian of noble background who had fled his homeland for good in 1920 following the revolution. Botvinnik was very privileged during the war, when he was able to play private matches in comfortable conditions far from the front. Of course, he was an engineer, and he contributed his skills to the war effort in that way. Then, when the war finished, Botvinnik was able to go to the first big tournament, at Groningen 1946, along with Smyslov, but Keres was not sent, because of political problems (see the Keres article). Keres might very well have won, had he gone, and hence outshone Botvinnik. Keres was an Estonian, not a Russian. Then, the Soviet Chess Organization joined FIDE in 1947, and almost immediately they were able to impose their program on the other nations. FIDE accepted the Soviet proposal in 1947 (this is noted in the introduction to Botvinnik's book on his best games, volume 2, covering 1947-70; Batsford published it in the early 1970s). The proposal had been largely put together by Botvinnik, who had been frustrated in his own attempts to get a world title match with Alekhine in the early 1940s, because of the war and because of Alekhine's ducking challenges from other players. Botvinnik wanted an established structure, and in fact the FIDE system was a big improvement, since it mandated the champion to face his toughest challenger every three years. Bronstein is actually quite bitter about Botvinnik's influence, and he has some valid points. Bronstein criticizes the holding of the World Championship tournament of 1948 BEFORE the Interzonal of that same year, instead of in the reverse order, since the top players from the 1938 era were seeded in (not Fine, who declined), except for Smyslov, who had become prominent in the meantime. Other top players of 1948, such as Najdorf, Boleslavsky, and Bronstein himself, who had come up in the war years, had to go through the 1948 Interzonal stage, and then the Candidates' tournament of 1950, while Botvinnik, who won the 1948 tournament against a strong but reduced field, composed of players against whom he had substantial experience, was sitting home in Moscow, waiting for his challenger to be determined. Bronstein is almost saying that if he had had a chance in 1948 at the World title, he might have won then, and he has a point, since his style was new, very sharp and tactical, and tough to deal with. The extra time allowed Botvinnik to come to grips with it, and he drew the match in 1951. The point on Bronstein's openings in the 1951 match is also from the introduction to Botvinnik's second book and from Bronstein's own book; Bronstein wrote that he surprised Botvinnik by playing the openings that Botvinnik himself liked to play. This can be a powerful psychological strategy as well, taken up by various strong players throughout chess history. Bronstein changed his repertoire prior to the match, and this threw Botvinnik off; Botvinnik hadn't played competitively for three years since winning in 1948, and he likely prepared for the lines that Bronstein had played earlier. Boleslavsky assisted Bronstein in 1951, as Bronstein writes. Fischer did the same thing prior to his 1972 match with Spassky; he played many variations for the first time in his life, to avoid Spassky's preparation. He won the match convincingly. Cheers from Kingston, Ontario, Canada. FrankEldonDixon 1132 p.m., GMT+5, February 26th, 2007.

Thanks for all that! But I hope you haven't misunderstood me: what you should do is insert references (Bronstein's book or whatever) in the article itself. Note that, although most Wikipedia references are to web pages, references to archaic things like books are OK too. e.g. there are a few in Comparing top chess players throughout history. Rocksong 11:23, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Origins of GM Title

[edit]

In the Salo Flohr article, you say FIDE first awarded GM titles in 1949, not 1950. I assume you're using a source for that... if so, would you be able to correct the information at Grandmaster (chess)? (citing your source, of course). Rocksong 03:43, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The 1949 date is given in Bronstein's book in an article there by Smyslov, who was one of the first recipients of the GM title at that time. I could check the FIDE history at their site, to see if I can confirm it. User:FrankEldonDixon, 5 March 2007, 10:46 p.m., GMT + 5

Let's stay with 1950 as the official year of the introduction of FIDE GM titles. I examined a number of sites on the web, which all said 1950. The FIDE site itself doesn't have the information, at least not that I could find. It may be that Smyslov is wrong. In any case, it really isn't that significant, one year or the other. If we stay with 1950, then that avoids a lot of changes to other articles. Perhaps someone else will comprehensively prove 1949, so let's wait for that. User:FrankEldonDixon, 5 March 2007, 11:40 p.m., GMT + 5

Furman

[edit]

Hello. Your article Semion Furman duplicates Semen Furman, written much earlier. Did you know that? Could you take best of these articles, write into one of them (supppose yours, much longer) and make redirect from the other? Best wishes pjahr 19:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did spot this, and was wondering how to proceed. I will do it in the next few days. But, I am a little unclear on the redirect method. Please advise. Cheers frankeldondixon 4:06 p.m., GMT +5, 10 April 2007.

Furman

[edit]

Frank - Hi there - as pjahr wrote to me also, I have merged everything into Semyon Furman - should work for all recognised redirects. Nice article by the way. - Brittle heaven 23:16, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lev aronin/ Lev Aronin

[edit]

Just a small thing, but I think the (very good, by the way) article at Lev aronin should be at Lev Aronin, as the surname should be capitalized. Flowerpotman talk-wot I've done 23:39, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notable games

[edit]

Hi Frank and thank you for your work for our chess project! - I write you because of the Notable games section - I think that sometimes you add too many such games. Of course almost all decisive games of great masters are notable in some sense, but in this general encyclopedia, we cannot overload articles with too many of them - we are not a chess database. Moreover - and this is much more important - WP:EL, an important guideline, says "Adding external links can be a service to our readers, but they should be kept to a minimum...". Happy editing,--Ioannes Pragensis 07:49, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thank you for your recent edit to E Vasiukov. Your edit included one or more links to the page Russian, which is a disambiguation page. This type of page is intended to direct users to more specific topics. Ordinarily we try to avoid creating links to disambiguation pages, since it is preferable to link directly to the specific topic relevant to the context. You can help Wikipedia by revising the links you added to E Vasiukov to refer directly to the most relevant topic. (This message was generated by an automatic process; if you believe it to be in error, please accept our apologies and report the error to help us improve this feature.) --Russ (talk) 18:33, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • The ambiguity is that Russian may refer to a language, an ethnic group, or the citizens of a particular republic. I assume in this context you probably meant the last, so you would want to change [[Russian]] to [[Russia]]n. --Russ (talk) 18:59, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Categorizing Soviet chess players

[edit]

I've created a section on the WikiProject chess talk page to discuss how we should categorize Soviet chess players within Category:Chess players by nationality. Since you have been a prolific contributor to our chess biographers, I invite you to weigh in with your views at WT:CHESS if you like. Quale 05:44, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to chess biography articles; they're outstanding. It would be very helpful if you could include the references you use on the page itself, rather than just noting them in your edit summaries. The edit summaries are not part of the article, and they aren't sufficient to meet the requirements of WP:ATTR. See WP:Citing sources for an explanation of how to cite sources in wikipedia articles. Quale 21:10, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Reuben Fine "Material was sourced as it was written" does not meet Wikipedia requirements. Your work on chess bios is great, but the sources must actually be put on the article page, typically in the References or Notes section. Mentioning the sources in the edit summaries is not sufficient. The edit summaries aren't part of the article, and good references should include page numbers and enough information for the reference to be identified precisely. See Vladimir Kramnik for an example of what that can look like. WP:CITE has information on how to provide references for Wikipedia articles. Quale 16:04, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chess writers

[edit]

I see you've been adding Category:American authors to some articles. Please note that this category does not actually exist; it is only a redirect to Category:American writers. So the tag you should be adding is Category:American writers, if not some more specific tag like Category:American non-fiction writers.

Also note that there is a Category:Chess writers that you can add articles to if appropriate. (It is not yet large enough to have been subdivided, so there isn't a specific "American chess writers" category.) --Paul A 02:34, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's necessary to add "He was also a chess writer" to the lead article chess players, unless they were/are particularly notable for it. Nearly every chess player supplements his/her income by writing. In the body of the article it is fine, but the lead should summarise their main achievements. Also, if it's not in the body then it definitely should not be in the lead. Peter Ballard 01:39, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing several typos I made when converting the list to a table in Canadian Open Chess Championship. I saw one of them, but you fixed it before I got to it. You also found several other more serious typos that I hadn't spotted yet. Quale 02:14, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for converting this list to a table; it looks much better now. Cheers, FrankEldonDixon, 15 October 2007, 1017 p.m. (GMT+5) ````

References

[edit]

I appreciate the work you're doing, but could I please ask that you use footnotes, rather than putting references in the text. It's easy: you just surround it by <ref> .... </ref>, and ensure there is a "references" or "footnotes" section. e.g. see this change[1] to the Bobby Fischer article. Peter Ballard 11:41, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, You have done some great chess contributions lately. Could I invite you to join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Chess? Especially the talk page Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Chess is good to have on your watch list. It is a place where people ask chess related questions and discuss the overall consistency of the chess articles. On another point, could you, if you create a new chess related article, add it to the list of chess topics? This is a page containing all chess topics. The link "related changes" on that page shows all recent changes to all chess articles (provided that the article is in the list). This makes it very useful for others to monitor recent changes (including spam) in the chess articles. Happy editing! Voorlandt 11:50, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind words. I am very honored to be asked to join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Chess group, and I accept your invitation. I will see if my recent Canadian Open Chess Championship article has been added to the chess topics list, and my other recent articles as well. I have several areas of interest in chess writing for wiki: 1) better documentation of important Canadian chess figures (I am Canadian); 2) improving existing biography articles on wiki; concentrating on players who have largely finished their careers, but also on some current players, for example Vassily Ivanchuk, for which the current English article is well below the standard needed for such an outstanding player; but I will leave most of the current coverage to others, if that is OK; 3) expanding the biography range to include important but so far non-covered players; 4) looking more at "Grandmasters without the title" themes; 5) improving my referencing for articles I already contributed to. Another area of interest for me is looking to make points in order to upgrade the "importance" aspect for certain key chess figures, for example, Korchnoi from High to Top; Bronstein from High to Top, Keres from High to Top, Rubinstein from High to Top, Tarrasch from High to Top, Zukertort from High to Top, Reshevsky from High to Top, Najdorf from High to Top, Portisch from Mid to High, and so forth. My reasoning is that Korchnoi, Bronstein, Keres, Rubinstein, Tarrasch, Zukertort, Reshevsky, and Najdorf all have reasonable claims to have been the strongest players in the world at certain times, although they did not become World Champion. Circumstances, such as wars, insufficient financial backing for matches, favouritism, and other political elements, intervened with these players, rather than their chess strength. Also, all of those players made very important contributions outside their playing achievements, which is another aspect for increasing their importance rankings. Portisch played in eight Candidates Tournaments, and won a large number of elite events, over a long career span; he is more than the mid-range figure he is currently credited with being. Another idea I have is to document important "Chess Controversies" into a separate article. So, I have enjoyed immensely my contributions so far, and look forward to doing much more, and improving the quality of my work as I gain more experience. Cheers, FrankEldonDixon, Kingston, Canada, 1406, GMT+5, Wed. Oct. 24, 2007 FrankEldonDixon 18:07, 24 October 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Category sorts

[edit]

I've noticed you've posted a question about category sorts on several talk pages (Talk:Chuck Diebert, Talk:Murray Turnbull, Talk:Ken Whyld, and I think at least one other one some time ago). I explained what's happening and how to fix it at Talk:Ken Whyld. Quale 00:31, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Nicklaus

[edit]

Hi FrankEldonDixon
Thanks for your work on Jack Nicklaus, especially on adding the list of books and media. I know in your edit summary you said that you sourced this information from the Nicklaus.com website, but I can't find the actual URL to reference it properly. If it isn't too much trouble could you give me the link(s) that you used on my talk page? Any other references you used and where you used them throughout the article would be greatly appreciated as well. And by all means, you could just do it yourself. Thanks for contributing! Grover (talk) 01:31, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of David L. Humphreys

[edit]

A tag has been placed on David L. Humphreys requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pumpmeup 04:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jean Chrétien

[edit]

An editor has nominated Jean Chrétien, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Chrétien and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:29, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bowell and Abbott

[edit]

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that Bowell and Abbott are not "Right Honourable", just "Honourable". I don't know why that is, it just is! Adam Bishop (talk) 21:47, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

King Doctorate

[edit]

I recently posted this on the William Lyon Mackenzie King talk page - it may be of interest to you and you may have information helpful for me:

I notice that someone has recently changed the remark about King being the first Canadian PM to hold a Ph.D. to being the second.
But is it clear that King actually earned his Ph.D. at all? After all, the Ph.D. is not listed among his postnomial letters. And it would appear to me from his biography at the Canadian Dictionary of Biography Online that he left his doctoral programme at Harvard without finishing his Ph.D. in order to become Deputy Minister of Labour.
If no one can provide proof that King actually finished his Ph.D., I'll delete the reference to him having completed his doctorate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adam sk (talkcontribs) 05:24, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your question. Harvard University gave King a doctorate in economics a few years after he physically left that university. He may have had work pending to complete his doctorate when he left Harvard, and completed it later on. The date of the degree was apparently 1908, by which time King had already been serving for several years as a civil servant in the post Deputy Minister of Labour. King first became an MP in 1908, and also in that year was appointed as the first Cabinet Minister of Labour. Both George Bowering's book "Egotists and Autocrats" and Bruce Hutchison's book "The Incredible Canadian" specify this information. I believe that Bowering (incorrectly) wrote that King was the first Canadian PM to earn a doctorate, likely not knowing about Abbott's Doctor of Laws, as I didn't until earlier this week. Hutchison, who knew King well, notes that King, while he was PM, occasionally reminded his younger colleagues that he had earned the Harvard PhD as a way of establishing the strength of his opinion on economic and financial issues. Regards, User:FrankEldonDixon, January 31, 2008, 17:47, GMT+5 FrankEldonDixon (talk) 22:47, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great updates to Alekhine and other chess biographies. I like your addition about Alekhine's falsified game scores. Ever since I read what Winter wrote about that I thought it deserved a mention. Of course Winter is a fan of Capablanca and that may color his view of Alekhine a bit, but he does seem to be scrupulous in his historical research. Quale (talk) 23:35, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliments! I want to get a better accuracy on the reference pages for Denker and Parr, to improve quite a few references on various chess bios, but my copy of that book is on loan right now! I also will reference the Kotov work on Alekhine a bit better, and get the url on Winter's work on Alekhine's 'tricks' at Sabadell 1945. It deserves to be referenced precisely, since Mr. Winter is the tops! Recently I've been busy on non-chess editing primarily, with a lot of Canadian news work and work on Canadian PMs, but will be getting back to more chess work in the weeks ahead. I have more to come of interest on Lasker as well. One thing on Capablanca: he apparently worked behind the scenes to keep Lasker out of New York 1927! (perhaps afraid of being upstaged as he was at New York 1924. But I need to tie this down; I think it's somewhere in Winter's work. This is similar to his dirty tricks re. Charles Jaffe, over the accusation of Jaffe throwing the game to Marshall at Havana 1913, which was almost certainly false. Capa then banned Jaffe from events he was himself playing in.)

Now, on another matter: I have a fairly major scandal I have been working on cracking for some time, I am getting ready to pull the plug, and am prepared to offer wikipedia early access to this as it breaks in the media. How should I go about doing this!? User:FrankEldonDixon, 18:47, 8 February 2008 FrankEldonDixon (talk) 23:47, 8 February 2008 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I don't really have any good advice with that sort of thing. I think that the Original Research prohibition makes it difficult to debut anything in Wikipedia, as really it has to appear somewhere else before it goes into an article so that it can be cited with the proverbial Reliable Sources. Anyway, I think your chess bio edits have really improved the articles, and when we get the page numbers in for the references that will make it even better. I've thought about ordering Denker's book, and your cites have made it sound even more appealing. Sorcerers Apprentice is another fine book. I'm sad that Bronstein is no longer with us (and Keres thirty years earlier). I'm sure they both had fascinating tales they took to the grave. Quale (talk) 03:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Jaffe

[edit]

Hello! During your major update of this article you added a part that I think is unclear:

"Chajes defeated Capablanca with the Black pieces in this tournament. In 1913, Chajes took 4th at New York (Quadrangular; Marshall won). In 1913, he lost a match to Capablanca at New York by 0.5-2.5. In that same year, he won matches in New York against Mieses and Oscar Chajes."

Did you mean Chajes or Jaffe? Both played in the same tournaments.

Could you please check the source that you used?

Thank you! --YoavD (talk) 06:26, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your question. This is a bit confusing, I realize.

As far as I can remember, I added this sentence to this part of the article: "Chajes defeated Capablanca with the Black pieces in this tournament." I know this is true, since this game can be found on any number of online games databases, including www.chessgames.com.

The tricky part is that there were several distinct Master tournaments held in New York in 1913, involving many of the same players. It is therefore quite problematic to keep them all straight, especially when records are sketchy from nearly 100 years ago.

I am quite certain that the rest of the paragraph which you cite was already present in this article, when I added to the article. I don't know the source of the other information, although good places to check are www.chessmetrics.com (the Charles Jaffe player file), and the work by Jeremy Gaige, which consists of a very comprehensive index of players and tournaments. This work by Gaige may not be searchable online, however. I'll have a look at chessmetrics, then post again when I find out more.

Cheers! --FrankEldonDixon, 17:48, GMT+5, 19 February 2008 (UTC) FrankEldonDixon (talk) 22:48, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Chessmetrics.com, the Charles Jaffe player file, has the New York 1913 (Quadrangular) result. But it does not have the three matches from 1913 quoted in the article.

Cheers! --FrankEldonDixon, 20:45, GMT+5, 19 February 2008 (UTC) FrankEldonDixon (talk) 01:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this! —Preceding unsigned comment added by ChessCreator (talkcontribs) 02:21, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Kevitz

[edit]

Thanks for your great chess contributions! Just a little comment, to have the references show up, simply type <references/> at the bottom of the page. Best regards, Voorlandt (talk) 22:32, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Our main reference for the winners, the USCF 2006 Yearbook], does not list Suttles as a co-champion in 1973. Do you have a better reference? Quale (talk) 01:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

According to the recently-published book "Chess on the Edge", by Bruce Harper and Yasser Seirawan, Suttles defeated GM Walter Browne in the last round to share first place in the 1973 U.S. Open in Chicago. Seirawan, then a 13-year-old, was there, played in the tournament, met Suttles when they played each other in the first round (Suttles won), and writes about the Browne -- Suttles game at some length in the book's introduction. Suttles scored 10/12 in that event, with all 12 games annotated in the book. I don't know Weinstein's score in the tournament. It's possible that Weinstein finished ahead of Suttles. I'll double-check this by going onto Canadian chess bulletin boards with a query about it. FrankEldonDixon, 12:24, March 27 2008, GMT+5, FrankEldonDixon (talk) 16:24, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On the site chessgames.com, in the brief Suttles bio listed there, he is listed as a co-winner of the 1973 U.S. Open. FrankEldonDixon, 19:12, March 27, 2008, GMT+5 FrankEldonDixon (talk) 23:11, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently Raymond Weinstein won on tie-break, although Suttles beat him in their individual game. Chess Life & Review, October 1973, p. 556, "Record U.S. Open in Chicago: Norman Weinstein Wins on Tiebreak". It was actually a five-way tie at 10 points between Weinstein, Suttles, Walter Browne, Greg DeFotis (Illinois), and Ruben Rodriguez (Philippines). Each earned $1080, which must be a five-way split of the total of first through fifth place prizes and accounts for more than half of the total $10,000 prize fund. Weinstein won the tiebreak, and the article comments that he faced by far the toughest competition, playing six of the seven top-ranked players in the tournament. (Aside from Weinstein, Suttles, and Browne, the only other player in the top 13 who I recognize is William Lombardy, placing 6–13 with 9½. The special prizes rewarded some players lower in the table. One of the eight players tied with Lombardy at 9½, Thomas Wozney (Ohio), collected $500 to Lombardy's $162.50 because he won the Expert 1st prize. Seirawan won the premier section with 8½ to collect $350, also out-earning Lombardy.) Suttles must certainly have been the moral victor, as he beat both Weinstein and Browne in their individual games. The article also comments that Suttles was an IM at the time, but was expected to receive the GM title soon. Our Duncan Suttles article says that he earned the title for a performance in 1972. This may be true, but Jeremy Gaige lists his title years as IM 1967 and GM 1973. Since the "official" source (or at least the 2006 USCF Yearbook cited in the U.S. Open Chess Championship article lists only Weinstein as the winner I've removed Suttles from 1973. I don't know how to resolve the apparent contradiction that for some years several winners are listed (were ties not broken for those years for some reason?) and yet for others they are. I hope to add a little detail about as many of the years (a single short paragraph) as I can. Maybe that will uncover other years where there were ties that aren't reported in the list that the USCF compiled. I think it would be good in tournament winners tables to indicate which wins were on tie-break. (Ken Whyld uses an * in his tables to indicate a win on tie-break, usually giving only the name of the winner.) Unfortunately we have to be careful if we don't have complete information. It would be a mistake to mark Weinstein's win as being on tie-break unless we can mark all of the wins on tie-break. If one tie-break win is marked, the reader will naturally expect that all tie-break wins are marked. I'm going to copy some of this discussion to Talk:U.S. Open Chess Championship so that it doesn't get lost in case we uncover more complete information on tie-breaks in the future. Quale (talk) 23:43, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an absolutely brilliant post!! Thanks for digging so deep on this question and others. The tiebreak situation is interesting; as you write, it is important to be consistent among champions of the different years for which the U.S. Open has been held. For the Canadian Open chess article, which I wrote, I listed all players who had tied for the top spot each year, based on best available information. Now, as a Canadian, I will exercise some diplomacy, and leave this U.S. Open question to American wikipedians to resolve, since it is their championship. Concerning Suttles' GM title, he earned his second and final norm at the 1972 San Antonio tournament, with a very strong field, but this event took place later in the year, after the 1972 Olympiad (where they normally formally award the titles in conjunction with the FIDE meetings), so he was not formally awarded the title until 1973. Cheers, FrankEldonDixon, 18:24, GMT+5, 23 April 2008 FrankEldonDixon (talk) 22:24, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ! You added the following detail: "In a Soviet-only tournament at Leningrad 1936, he placed third with 8.5/14."

Where did you find this detail? I checked in the following tables:

  • [2] All-Union Young Masters 1936
  • [3] All-Union tournament of 1 category- Leningrad 1936 and All-Union tournament of 1 category- Leningrad 1936 and All-Union tournament of 1 category- Leningrad 1936

But in all those tables Levenfish does not appear. Please let me know as I am translating this article into Hebrew. --Niemzowitsch (talk) 08:24, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir: Thanks for your interest! The Leningrad 1936 tournament details can be found at the site www.chessmetrics.com, click on the Grigory Levenfish results section. This source may also have other information you don't have. I should have referenced this information in the Levenfish article, and will do so in the near future. Best wishes with your work. Levenfish was an exceptional player, drawing a 1937 match with Botvinnik, and winning the Soviet title twice. He was ranked #9 in the world in 1937, according to chessmetrics.com ratings. Too bad he didn't get more opportunities outside the Soviet Union!! User: FrankEldonDixon, 13:11, GMT+5, April 1, 2008 FrankEldonDixon (talk) 17:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hitler

[edit]

Hi. I undid your additions there because the first was date trivia (you may well find it "interesting" but others may look at it as mere coincidence) and the code stuff seems more relevant to WW2 in general than it does to an article about Hitler in particular. I hope that makes sense. Best wishes, --John (talk) 19:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

[edit]
Have a barnstar!
For all your contribs.
i123Pie biocontribs 20:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Hello! You added on the Revision as of 15:47, 22 June 2007 that Keres defended his Estonian title in 1936 by drawing a challenge match against Paul Schmidt with 3.5-3.5. When I check the Estonian Chess Championship article I find that in 1936 Paul Felix Schmidt is the champion. Could you check which is correct? --Niemzowitsch (talk) 08:01, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think what happened there was that Keres didn't play in the 1936 Estonian Championship tournament (he was very busy internationally, with some excellent results), Schmidt did play, and won. Schmidt then challenged Keres to a match, which was drawn. Cheers, FrankEldonDixon, 12:03 p.m., GMT +5, 22 April 2008 FrankEldonDixon (talk) 16:03, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Niemzowitsch (talk) 03:32, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RUSSIA roll call and your input required

[edit]

Privet. You are receiving this message as you were listed on the membership list of WP:RUSSIA at Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia/Members. Recent times has seen minimal activity within WikiProject Russia, and there is an attempt to re-invigorate the project and have it become more organised into a fully-fledge functioning project, with the aim of increasing the quality of Russia-related articles across English wikipedia.

As we don't know which listed members are active within the project and Russia-related article, all listed members are receiving this message, and are requested to re-affirm their active status on Russia-related article by re-adding their username to Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia/Members by adding:

# {{User|YOURUSERNAME}}

to the membership list. You may also like to place {{User Russian Project}} on your userpage, as this will also place you in Category:WikiProject Russia members.

There is also an active proposal on the creation of a single WP:RUSSIA project. The proposal can be viewed at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Russia#Proposal_for_overhaul_and_creation_of_a_single_WP:RUSSIA_project, and your comments and suggestions are welcomed and encouraged at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Russia/Proposal.

We all look forward to your continued support of WP:RUSSIA and any comments you may have on the proposal. --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 04:37, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aldon Lewis Lenard

[edit]

Hi, and thanks for your work on Aldon Lewis Lenard. You probably noticed the {{notability}} tag at the top of the article. It looks to me like Mr. Lenard is probably notable according to our guidelines here, but the article really needs some citations to reliable sources to back that up. As the article creator and principle author, I would guess that if anyone knows where to find them, you do. Do you think you could add them to the article? Thanks, Jfire (talk) 21:59, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your appreciation. I will get back to this project of finding more references for his career and achievements; it will be an ongoing effort. I agree that the notability criteria have now been satisfied; he was twice an All-Star in a league which evolved into the Canadian Football League; he was twice an All-Star at the College level with Queen's; member of three Halls of Fame; headed up several athletics administrative bodies; part of several championships as a football coach; etc. He was someone who was very, very good at many different parts aspects of sports, as opposed to being absolutely outstanding at one or two. FrankEldonDixon, Dec. 16, 2008.

Hi, FrankEldonDixon, I see you've done quite a lot of work recently on articles about chess champions. Your additions to Alexander Alekhine are interesting, but have a couple of problems:

  • The additions about the 1927 match and the long, unsuccessful negotiations for a rematch are too long for this article, which is already long. I suggest you move the additions to related articles, for example World Chess Championship 1927.
  • The added material has no supported citations. Citations are required, otherwise the additions are likely to be removed. Please read WP's verifiability policy about why citations are needed and techniques for producing citations. In addition, citations to an article which already has many citations must be presented in the same way. For the method used in this article, refTools saves a lot of work and User:Philcha#Tools has notes on how to set up and use refTools. --Philcha (talk) 07:52, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you don't sign your discussion posts. It's very easy, ~~~~ (exactly 4 tildes) makes the software insert your user name, a link to your personal discussion, and the date and time. Leave a message at my discussion page if you're finding difficulties in getting instructions on other WP techniques. --Philcha (talk) 07:52, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide some references for the James Dodson (author) article you created? Thanks, PDCook (talk) 03:02, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The titles of Dodson's books have been obtained from the covers of his books. I will try to obtain more information about him, along with more references. FrankEldonDixon (talk) 2:44 p.m., 21 December 2009 (UTC) FrankEldonDixon (talk) 19:44, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello FrankEldonDixon! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. David Smart - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Yuri Nikolaevsky - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Anne Somerset - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Richard Goldstein (writer born 1944) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:10, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hoffa barnstar

[edit]
The Editor's Barnstar
For a great job cleaning up and rewriting the Jimmy Hoffa article, without getting "disappeared" yourself. tedder (talk) 21:50, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I second this barnstar. Kudos for your work. That article was kind of a mess due to a lot of agenda-driven editing. --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 00:43, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's some question whether Robert Sobel the history professor and author is the same person who played Bobby Fischer twice in 1956 and 1957. See WT:CHESS#Robert Sobel. Quale (talk) 01:49, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

David Smart

[edit]

I notice you created an article David Smart a long time ago. It is unreferenced and it looks like someone would have to go off the Internet to be able to find sources to verify the claims in the article. Even if all the claims could be verified I think the article is borderline as to notability. I'm just letting you know I've put a PROD template on the page to encourage you or anyone who sees it to try to improve the article. Soap 13:50, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Smart for deletion

[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article David Smart, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Smart until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Michig (talk) 09:09, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Watson and Byron Nelson

[edit]

You edited into Watson's article how Nelson helped him. I know the two had a special relationship, but that it helped Watson to win the Western Open in 1974 isn't likely.

Here's why

The Western Open was played two weeks after the US Open at Winged Foot. In between was the American Golf Classic, Watson played there too. When did he get away to see Nelson.

The news coverage of Watson's Western Open win makes no mention of him getting help from Nelson. Don't you think he would have thanked Nelson.

Watson's first win at the Nelson wasn't till 1975.

I'd re-edit the article as to Nelson helping Watson but pinpointing to any specific time unless you can find a reference source for it. Preferably written near the time not 20 years later. Golf history gets skewered by the media and players embellish little things into mountains years later. If you want me to send you some examples let me know or just look how I edited out some BS in the Lee Elder article or a wrong quote in the one for the 1975 US Open.- William 17:46, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello: I have edited the Tom Watson article a few minutes ago, in response to your points. I've come across more detailed information on this specific relationship between Nelson and Watson, and have utilized these in the improved article. I think your points are accurate and well-taken. Thanks. Cheers! -User:FrankEldonDixon, 1:28 PM EST, 9 March 2011

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Major League Baseball in four decades, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.juggle.com/kid-gleason.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 03:39, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ed Dudley has 24 Top 10 finishes in Major Championships

[edit]

Go to his page. A round of 16 finish is a tie for 9th.

Editor Tewapack noted this when he undid[4] an edit[5] of yours to Macdonald Smith less than two months ago. Also note I mentioned this very topic on this talk page[6].- William 21:53, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited John Dean, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fifth Amendment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

George Von Elm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Sun Valley, Billy Burke, Springfield Township and Bobby Jones

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nelson Rockefeller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Albany and Charles Higham
Helena Guergis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cabinet

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Willie Hunter (golfer) has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 23:52, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

George Von Elm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Spalding
Rona Ambrose (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to NDP
Willie Hunter (golfer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Deal

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jonathan Aitken (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Windsor
Willie Hunter (golfer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Robert A. Gardner

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Chris Rudge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Executive and Bob Nicholson
Newt Gingrich (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Deferment
Watergate scandal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to John Rhodes

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

William P. Bell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to PGA and Balboa Park
Cataraqui Golf and Country Club (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Aboriginal
Frank Stranahan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to American

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Titanic (1953 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basque (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Circle of Friends (1995 film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Communion and Rugby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Nathan Divinsky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grandmaster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:02, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Sean O'Sullivan (baseball), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ERA and Pioneer League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:27, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sarah Bradford has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable person. One interview does not notability make.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:49, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Of course she is notable, but it is necessary to add some more. Best thing to do to really prove it by WP:AUTHOR is to add published reviews or her books-- and are there any awards? Please check the bio part isn't a copy--it's more personal than we usually do. DGG ( talk ) 01:29, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think notability is clearly established by her dozen major works, which have been well received and have sold well. Improving the article is a task I will be tackling soon. Likely, more relevant information would round out the article, and I will be endeavouring to obtain it. Remember, there was nothing on wikipedia about her before I wrote this piece, and that is a shortfall now corrected.

FrankEldonDixon ( talk ) 17:21 EDT, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eric Hansen (chess player), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Grandmaster and Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sarah Hopkins Bradford, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Attorney and Caucasian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:32, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sarah Hopkins Bradford, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Livingston County and Mount Morris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited E. Howard Hunt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Mitchell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:08, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Election results

[edit]

Warning Just a friendly reminder, keep the RR's down to three, and please do not participate in an edit war. United States presidential election, 2012 is subject to sanctions, see Wikipedia:General sanctions/2012 Presidential Campaign/Log. Apteva (talk) 01:34, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jimmy Hoffa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santo Trafficante (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jimmy Hoffa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Louis County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert Hunter (author), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United States Amateur Championship (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Farrell Dobbs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darwin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Robarts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NDP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jeb Stuart Magruder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Mitchell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Minor" edits

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Toccata quarta (talk) 16:39, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please review WP:OVERLINK. It is not appropriate to link names of US states or well-known place names, like New York City. Regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:52, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harry Vardon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Braid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mary Rita Holland, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Masters, New Democratic Party and Bicentennial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced edit to Kingston, Ontario

[edit]

Hi Frank, Thanks for additions to this page. Just wondering what your reference was for your assertion: "Aboriginal settlement in the area now known as Kingston dates to many centuries before the birth of Jesus Christ." Current research does not back this up. Because this is unsourced, I have replaced it with some sourced content. Cheers. -- BC  talk to me 21:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. Just found some relevant info. that supports this. I have added it to the article along with references. Best.-- BC  talk to me 01:01, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kingston, Ontario, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Lawrence College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christopher Alexander Hagerman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George II. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Canadian Open (golf)
added links pointing to Harry Cooper, Craig Wood, David Hearn and Jason Day

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Norman T. Whitaker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page U.S. Championship. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fred Reinfeld, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page College of the City of New York. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Capablanca and Jaffe

[edit]

Hi, I removed some material you wrote many years ago at Charles Jaffe because it wasn't adequately sourced. On minor matters this isn't a big deal, but when it reflects unfavorably on a person (Capablanca in this case) proper sourcing is required. Doubtless wikipedia was more free and easy back in 2007 and there was less demand for sources, but as you are no doubt aware things are stricter now. Do you have a book or other reference which describes the events you refer to? Regards. MaxBrowne (talk) 03:03, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Isaac Boleslavsky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sverdlovsk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anthony Santasiere, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Orange. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:20, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Laszlo Witt, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Grandmaster and Laszlo Szabo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stanley Baldwin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward Grey. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stanley Baldwin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alfred Baldwin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this article may be of interest to you. If you have some good sources feel free to expand it. MaxBrowne (talk) 09:28, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Anthony Santasiere
added a link pointing to Kitchener
Arthur Lee, 1st Viscount Lee of Fareham
added a link pointing to D.S.O.
John Godfrey Moore
added a link pointing to Arthur Lee
Jonathan Penrose
added a link pointing to Grandmaster
Leonard Barden
added a link pointing to Grandmaster

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elod Macskasy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grandmaster. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Folke Rogard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grandmaster. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henry Lascelles (1690–1753), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Whig. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pan American Intercollegiate Team Chess Championship

[edit]

You added a section, "Intercollegiate chess before the Pan Am". There is only one reference, from February 1914, but you gave results for many years. Where did you get these results? Could you add some references, or, could you suggest to me where to find all this stuff so that I can add references? Thanks. Bruce leverett (talk) 04:00, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bruce: I found this material in the American Chess Bulletin, founded by Hermann Helms in 1904. Parts of this are available online, having been scanned into a collection of material given by a donor who had all the back issues. If you were to google 'American Chess Bulletin' and do some creative searching among the results, you could find it; I used this method. I had to step through the pages to find this material, which is time-consuming and tedious, but there are annual indices. The reference I cited had a list of the winners to that stage, I believe. There are very likely further results from this series of U.S. post-secondary tournaments on the ACB-online source, but haven't had time to seek them out. Helms had ties to the event, so he arranged for prominent coverage to support it. Since Wikipedia had no coverage of this, I felt it appropriate to add it in. I had contributed to the Pan American article earlier, and represented my school, Queen's University of Kingston, Canada, in the PanAms, back in the day! There are also some games from these early events in the ACB. Hope this helps. FrankEldonDixon (talk) 17:15 EDT, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, I kind of suspected you had found it in ACB, but I only found ACB's up through 1921 or so. Interestingly, I found some newspaper or other references to one or the other League from the 1930's, including one where the University of Pittsburgh was going to be playing. I will continue to rummage around when I have time. Bruce leverett (talk) 18:46, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Viktor Korchnoi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Velden. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Viktor Korchnoi, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Levy and David Goodman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I cut back on your edit to the article. Namely "lengthy", "unprecedented thoroughness and depth" both for not following WP:NPOV plus "The book caused a sensation and led to prolonged debate in British government over inadequate security measures and potential cover-up.[1]" because the statement about the book causing a sensation is unreferenced. You can't use the book itself as a statement for such a thing. There was already a paragraph concerning some of the things Pincher has written. I consolidated that paragraph with yours....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:05, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elod Macskasy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swimming. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, FrankEldonDixon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{Thank you very much. I am honored by inclusion for this opportunity. However, I am exceptionally busy on other matters right now, but would like to take part in the future. Cheers! FrankEldonDixon}

Mark Taimanov

[edit]

Hello, I was surprised by your addition to the article [7] about him being married 4 times. As I do not read Russian I looked for another reference. Here it is: [8]. You may prefer to use this. --Yoavd (talk) 09:57, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Razvan Preotu) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Razvan Preotu, FrankEldonDixon!

Wikipedia editor Scope creep just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add an image to the article and additional references, which can be found via Google News.

To reply, leave a comment on Scope creep's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

scope_creep (talk) 00:08, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, FrankEldonDixon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stanley Thompson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Green Gables (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Henry Brouncker, 3rd Viscount Brouncker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shinnecock Hills Golf Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Thomson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article John A. Rae has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 22:44, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stefano Rosselli del Turco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

John Daly (golfer)

[edit]

Discussion: With respect to the highest single-hole scores in PGA Tour history, referred to in this article, I do know that Ray Ainsley made a score of 22 (I believe) at the 1938 U.S, Open, Cherry Hills. Dale Douglas, Tour winner, scored a 19 at the ninth hole at Pebble Beach Golf Links during one of the Bing Crosby Pro-Am tournaments in the 1960s. So I modified the article, by writing that Daly's score at the sixth hole during the Bay Hill tournament was 'one of the highest' single-hole scores in PGA Tour history, which is certainly true.

Cheers, FrankEldonDixon, 15:22, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, FrankEldonDixon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emmet Flood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attorney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Stewart, 1st Earl of Moray, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berwick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:43, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Donald Spoto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:17, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jim Ferrier, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Harry Cooper and Craig Wood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:50, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

With respect to the article on Jim Ferrier, I have done quite a bit of useful work to improve it, finding new references, and adding a lot of detail. My work has been enhanced by some fine complementary work from editors. I believe this article now needs a good picture of Ferrier, to round it out. I have never attached a picture to an article on Wikipedia, so I will rely on others to respond to this request. Once a picture is obtained, I believe the article could be nominated, as it is likely the most comprehensive one on Ferrier to be found anywhere. Ferrier is very near selection to the World Golf Hall of Fame, and could receive this honor in the coming years. Cheers, FrankEldonDixon FrankEldonDixon (talk) 22:24, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Benny Gantz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Palestine
National Defense University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to IDF

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:39, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charlotte Whitton, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Armenian, Ukrainian and Progressive Conservative (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:16, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jean Chrétien, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joliet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cricket, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles II.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article William Kaplan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a resume hosting service, fails WP:NBASIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 14:30, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ "Too Secret Too Long", by Chapman Pincher, 1984.