User talk:Francoperuvien

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Avianca, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. M D Potter. Any comments? 20:01, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

You have been asked several times in the past to stop modifying selective articles to meet your personal preferences. This amounts to vandalism. Please stop. jasepl (talk) 05:23, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please do not remove valid content without at least providing an explanation (that's what the edit summary is for). And do not modify selective articles to meet your personal preferences, but first discuss your PoV at the right place, because several editors have undone your edits, which you do make selectively. There is no denying either. Also, conveniently blanking your talk page (which you have every right to do, but that's besides the point) doesn't make others' input change. jasepl (talk) 06:30, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, please do not remove valid content from articles (as you have done here and here ) without at least providing an edit summary. You have not done so for a vast majority of your edits. Also, again, do not modify selective articles to meet your personal preferences, but first discuss your PoV at the right place, because several editors have undone your edits. jasepl (talk) 07:55, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jorge Chávez International Airport. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. HkCaGu (talk) 10:15, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Please observe established consensus on airport and destination listing. We list only branding and operators, not parent companies. Look at how U.S. regional carriers are listed. If you have any concern, bring it up to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports. HkCaGu (talk) 16:13, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at El Dorado International Airport, you may be blocked from editing. HkCaGu (talk) 10:20, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at San Francisco International Airport, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. HkCaGu (talk) 23:21, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Los Angeles International Airport. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. HkCaGu (talk) 04:07, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent editing against the consensus as to what should be done. You have made no attempt to respond to messages, but have just persisted with trying to impose your own version. That is not how Wikipedia works: if you really think there is justification for your changes then please explain them, and try to achieve consensus. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:39, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ministro Pistarini International Airport, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 22:08, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ministro Pistarini International Airport. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. LAN Airlines do operate an EZE-SCL-JFK service without a change of plane. Despite not a non-stop service, the flight is direct. Check it out at the airline's website. Jetstreamer ^Talk 22:51, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ministro Pistarini International Airport, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I already provided you with the link for the LAN flight to New York, and you keep disregarding it. The next time you vandalize the page I will report you to an admin. Jetstreamer ^Talk 14:01, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have done enough vandalism in airport articles. Wikipedia is not your own. It belongs to every participant. You do not dictate styles and formats. You must work with others. If you continue such vandalism in any of the many aspects, including putting in corporate structure into airline operator's name, I will definitely recommend a very long term block if not a ban for you. You have been warned. HkCaGu (talk) 18:00, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at San Carlos de Bariloche Airport, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jetstreamer ^Talk 23:56, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Aerolíneas Argentinas, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:10, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Avianca Service From IAD

Please be advised, Avianca's 5 of 7 weekly flights from IAD have continuing service to La Paz, Bolivia. Please do not delete La Paz from Avianca's IAD destinations. (Shakbok (talk) 00:54, 29 October 2012 (UTC))[reply]

November 2012

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Los Angeles International Airport, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. HkCaGu (talk) 07:06, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Cancún International Airport, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. HkCaGu (talk) 18:46, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]