User talk:Francopelaez27

Welcome!

Hello, Francopelaez27, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:45, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will add information to it Francopelaez27 (talk) 22:49, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brenden Aaronson

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced content to Wikipedia, as you have repeatedly at Brenden Aaronson, you will be blocked from editing. Anwegmann (talk) 22:35, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Brenden Aaronson shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Anwegmann (talk) 22:36, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not doing anything wrong. Stephen king was the original Medford Messi he passed it on to Brenden Aaronson Francopelaez27 (talk) 22:38, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are, by Wikipedia definition, absolutely doing something wrong. Please stop. Anwegmann (talk) 22:39, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’m a huge fan of Brenden Aaronson I’m just putting a nickname that the usmnt calls him. Francopelaez27 (talk) 22:42, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You must provide a source for all information you add—one that is verifiable by anyone. You have not done that. Please do not add the nickname unless you properly cite/source it. If you continue to add this information without a proper citation and source, you will be reported for edit warring, disruptive editing, and vandalism. I am pinging @Mattythewhite: so that he is aware of this. Anwegmann (talk) 22:46, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have warned you twice already for disruptive editing and edit waring. This is the third warning. I have copied the links with information about how to edit, source, cite, and contribute productively to Wikipedia. Given that you have received three warnings for the same disruptive actions and received the following information twice, if you edit Brenden Aaronson's page again without following the guidelines and processes outlined in the pages linked below, I will report you, and you will be blocked from editing.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I am also pinging @C.Fred: here, as he has been involved with this situation. Anwegmann (talk) 23:24, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring to restore unsourced material to a biography article despite ample warning. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:45, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]