User talk:FrancisLightHouse

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FrancisLightHouse (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please some one unblock this IP. It was wrongly blocked. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:74.99.83.3

Decline reason:

No, we'd prefer that you didn't avoid your block by logging out. You really are blocked from editing. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:11, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FrancisLightHouse (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Some one please unblock the IP address http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:74.99.83.3 I am not aksing you to unblock this account "FrancisLightHouse". And please type answer in a more easyer way so I can understand you. I was wrongly accused of somthing that I did not eaven due.

Decline reason:

First, you used up all your requests at the IP talk page. Second, this username is in violation of the username policy. Third, we really don't like it when people post a second unblock request when the first one hasn't been reviewed. Protecting this page now; have fun. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:20, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were accused of writing about FrancisLightHouse, a subject which does not meet Wikipedia's notability criteria, of failing to stop even after being asked several times, and of making the false statement, "Wikipedia does not have the write to have any text, and/or artical about FrancisLightHouse." Is it your claim that you did not do these things? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:28, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FrancisLightHouse (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No I was not asked several times to stop. And I am not talking about unblocking "FrancisLightHouse's" account. I am taking about the IP Address http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:74.99.83.3 Yes I also was accousd of somthing that I did not even due. Please stop herasing me and just unblock this IP Address.

Latter I was accuse of Block evasion. Witch I did not due also I was asking for the name "FrancisLightHouse" not to be on wikipedia's ban list, or even when you goto this website. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FrancisLightHouse. I also do not want it to say the following: This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference. and so on.

I hope you under stand and please just unblock this IP Address http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:74.99.83.3

Decline reason:

Same as above. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:20, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Look, FrancisLightHouse. We're not going to unblock your IP, we're not going to unblock User:FrancisLightHouse or any of its numerous alternative accounts you have created, and we're not going to add or remove any material regarding the lighthouse because you demand so. You do not own the article, and you cannot revoke contributions licensed under the Creative Commons Sharealike 3.0 Unported license. MuZemike 23:36, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]