User talk:Frances Gaudet

People are attempting to differntiate beween the two prominant George Pappas'- one the professor and the other a Politial Activist. There articles are strong, referenced and people do not understand how such a label as sock puppet can be auto matically out to anyone who is typing about another person. How can George Pappas be differntiated from George Pappas without altering the name-Mr. George Pappas, George Pappas sunshine129? I'm trying to be funny. We just need some understnding because the info is the same for every politician in the Provincial/ Federal/ Municpal arena, George however, is in the Green Party and almost any page with Green Party Candidates and statistics, ridings, etc. are getting removed faster than people can type them.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Frances Gaudet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

there are no sockpuppets here, Frances is quite real and I can not work on any other wiki stuff, reviews and edits, etc. A lot of people share computers

Decline reason:

"Frances" seems to have only the same interest in the Green Party of Ontario. And she makes edits that are very similar to George's. A lot of people do share computers, but it's funny how these two seem to share a lot more. — Daniel Case (talk) 14:38, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

STOP

Please STOP creating all these George Pappas clone articles! All you're doing is copying the same information into multiple titles. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 06:55, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of George Pappas Scarborough-Agincourt

A tag has been placed on George Pappas Scarborough-Agincourt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 06:56, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of George Pappas Ward 40

A tag has been placed on George Pappas Ward 40 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 06:56, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of George Pappas, Scarborough-Agincourt

A tag has been placed on George Pappas, Scarborough-Agincourt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 06:57, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:George Pappas Scarborough-Agincourt Ward 40

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 06:58, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Scarborough-Agincourt Ward 40 Residents' Association

A tag has been placed on Scarborough-Agincourt Ward 40 Residents' Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 07:01, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Scarborough-Agincourt Ward 40 Residents' Association, you will be blocked from editing. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 07:02, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Scarborough-Agincourt Ward 40 Residents' Association has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b (links: http://http://unhyphenatedcanadian.blogspot.com/2009/06/has-toronto-seceded-from-toronto.html). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:54, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of George Pappas (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

So Why 08:52, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New

As we are both members of the same associaiton and party its a given the interests and pages we wish to create are similar-look at the works of other political parties or figures-most of those contributers/ creators or editors had like minded works-anyone can be arbitrarily deemed a sockpuppet. One admin (mulka) has even been playing partisan politics-un editing work from parties other than the Liberal Party of Scarborough-Agincourt-both NDP & Green have been 'vandalized' by this apparantly staunch liberal supporter. Do you not think all Green Party people would put similar posts/ edits-no surprise there!

George Pappas

I think that you just proved the sockpuppetry yourself. And I can't find anyone named "mulka" around. So it's either another cloaked personal attack, or just some more baseless accusations. Nothing to be done here. Tim Song (talk) 03:23, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]