User talk:Frédéric LANGLOIS

This is Frédéric LANGLOIS's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guilbert Express (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HighKing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The topic is about a company and therefore must meet WP:NCORP guidelines. WP:NCORP requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references in the article meet the criteria. The company profiles are based entirely on interviews with a company officer and the rest are PRIMARY sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Guilbert Express and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Guilbert Express, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HighKing⁺⁺ 15:00, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Frédéric LANGLOIS! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! HighKing⁺⁺ 15:00, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guilbert Express to HighKing

Hello @HighKing,

Thank you for for fthe time you spent to analyze my proposal of english page Guilbert Express. this page was a simple and exatly translation of a french page Guilbert Express wich is published since a long time on the french version ok Wokipedia. All reference are the same in french and thank to you because I deleted the broken link (3).

I though that to put this this translation on the uk version was a good opportunity because the story of the company Guilbert Express since 1905 could interested a large part of people on internet because this company has taken a large part in the development of professional tools since its creation over a century ago. The references listed are supposed to represent various sources which accredit the idea of a company belonging to the common heritage and which with its millions of users around the world is today a reference for all users of these types of products. I have no idea at this time to the best maneer to respond at your wishes to obtain multiple sources as NCORP ask. It seems to me I have a lot of different sources which give credence to the idea of a society that is part of the European industrial intangible heritage.

So when you say "reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject" Isn't that already the case? Here are my first reactions to your intervention and what I could tell you at this time.

Have a good day

Frédéric

Concern regarding Draft:Guilbert Express

Hello, Frédéric LANGLOIS. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Guilbert Express, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guilbert Express (December 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Almost unchanged since last submitted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Guilbert Express and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Guilbert Express, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 12:39, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guilbert Express page

Ok all. delete my page because it is too difficult to be accepted by the community. I have made a lot of reference changes but obviously no one is looking at them! My company exists since 1905 and is the number one all arounfd the world for its productions but it doesn't matter: delete it! Thanks a lot! frederic langlois

New message from 331dot

Hello, Frédéric LANGLOIS. You have new messages at 331dot's talk page.
Message added 13:17, 11 December 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

331dot (talk) 13:17, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]