User talk:Foxvideo90

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Michaelshea2004 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Michaelshea2004. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. firefly ( t · c ) 12:09, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Foxvideo90 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Should I just go with the standard offer? Also can you do me a favour and go and tell BootlegScarce to LEAVE ME ALONE?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! Foxvideo90 (talk) 13:52, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. 331dot (talk) 14:02, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.