User talk:Foxtrot19

Speedy deletion of Ryan William Cook

A tag has been placed on Ryan William Cook, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Beach drifter (talk) 22:54, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ryan William Cook has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dloh cierekim 22:59, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Foxtrot19! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Dloh cierekim 22:59, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Ryan William Cook revisited

Thanks for your note. Unfortunately you will need verifiable sources that show notability. On reviewing the article, I see neither.

Notability needs to be more than "local". Also, the article was rife nonsense like "showered with worldly goods" and "when the command wolf was caught having a three way affair . . . ." It goes on to describe other unsavory activities. At no point does it assert notability. From what I can see, you'd be as well of starting from scratch! I am unable to find any Google hits that would assert notability or verify any of the content in the deleted article.

Please read the manual of style to see how to better write articles. Another problem is the lack of verifiable sources. Defamatory information is unacceptable. Please see WP:BLP. Any negative material must be sourced from reliable sources-- Please see WP:RS. Please do not attempt to recreate this article without a thorough understanding of notability and verifiability. Unsourced material that violates WP:BLP will be removed as soon as it is seen.

I see you already got a welcome. It has links to our policies and guidelines to help you edit constructively. Please feel free to resubmit the article if you can show verifiable sources and that the article meets notability. Cheers, Dloh cierekim 01:51, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

text from deleted article

here you are

Sorry you feel this is a matter of my opinion. It is a matter of building an encyclopedia. You might want to try a personal webhost, like Facebook. Cheers, Dloh cierekim 01:14, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]