User talk:Fox/October 2016
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Fox. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks
I appreciate it. James J. Lambden (talk) 17:46, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- @James J. Lambden: Not a problem! — foxj 18:46, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: September 2016
|
Editing News #3—2016
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter • Subscribe or unsubscribe on the English Wikipedia
Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor Team has mainly worked on a new wikitext editor. They have also released some small features and the new map editing tool. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. You can find links to the list of work finished each week at mw:VisualEditor/Weekly triage meetings. Their current priorities are fixing bugs, releasing the 2017 wikitext editor as a beta feature, and improving language support.
Recent changes
- You can now set text as small or big.[1]
- Invisible templates have been shown as a puzzle icon. Now, the name of the invisible template is displayed next to the puzzle icon.[2] A similar feature will display the first part of hidden HTML comments.[3]
- Categories are displayed at the bottom of each page. If you click on the categories, the dialog for editing categories will open.[4]
- At many wikis, you can now add maps to pages. Go to the Insert menu and choose the "Maps" item. The Discovery department are adding more features to this area, like geoshapes. You can read more on MediaWiki.org.[5]
- The "Save" button now says "Save page" when you create a page, and "Save changes" when you change an existing page.[6] In the future, the "Save page" button will say "Publish page". This will affect both the visual and wikitext editing systems. More information is available on Meta.
- Image galleries now use a visual mode for editing. You can see thumbnails of the images, add new files, remove unwanted images, rearrange the images by dragging and dropping, and add captions for each image. Use the "Options" tab to set the gallery's display mode, image sizes, and add a title for the gallery.[7]
Future changes
The visual editor will be offered to all editors at the remaining 10 "Phase 6" Wikipedias during the next month. The developers want to know whether typing in your language feels natural in the visual editor. Please post your comments and the language(s) that you tested at the feedback thread on mediawiki.org. This will affect several languages, including Thai, Burmese and Aramaic.
The team is working on a modern wikitext editor. The 2017 wikitext editor will look like the visual editor and be able to use the citoid service and other modern tools. This new editing system may become available as a Beta Feature on desktop devices in October 2016. You can read about this project in a general status update on the Wikimedia mailing list.
Let's work together
Do you teach new editors how to use the visual editor? Did you help set up the Citoid automatic reference feature for your wiki? Have you written or imported TemplateData for your most important citation templates? Would you be willing to help new editors and small communities with the visual editor? Please sign up for the new VisualEditor Community Taskforce.
If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 October 2016
- News and notes: Fundraising, flora and fauna
- Discussion report: Cultivating leadership: Wikimedia Foundation seeks input
- Technology report: Upcoming tech projects for 2017
- Featured content: Variety is the spice of life
- Traffic report: Debates and escapes
- Recent research: A 2011 study resurfaces in a media report
Please don't remove templates from a Featured Article. You may believe it is useless, but that doesn't mean other users find it so, and no one at the FAC review deemed it useless, either. As an administrator, you should know that you should raise any queries you may have on the respective article talk page rather than remove content willy-nilly. — Calvin999 08:13, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Calvin999: You have read the "be bold" guideline, right? It's a fundamental principle. As is your revert. Just because something is Featured-quality does not mean it cannot be edited. — foxj 14:40, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Being bold by removing a table that aides in the navigation of the table itself is not helpful. Well, yes I am afraid it does to some extent, because you are significantly altering what multiple people deemed as being appropriate and worthy of promotion. You should know that any change which could or would have an effect on the quality and accessibility of the article to the 600-700 people who view it each day should be discussed on the respective talk page first. — Calvin999 14:46, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- The anchors move whenever the table is sorted. This doesn't seem ideal for navigation, to me. — foxj 14:47, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Being bold by removing a table that aides in the navigation of the table itself is not helpful. Well, yes I am afraid it does to some extent, because you are significantly altering what multiple people deemed as being appropriate and worthy of promotion. You should know that any change which could or would have an effect on the quality and accessibility of the article to the 600-700 people who view it each day should be discussed on the respective talk page first. — Calvin999 14:46, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Review Article that was protected
Hello sir, Please review this Draft article DJ Kentalky. It was deleted in (July 2016) because of the Census comment see DJ Kentalky. This deletion discussion proves that Wikipedia Editors are no longer reading the wikipedia policy according to This AFD Sentence. The subject article DJ Kentalky Meets WP:MUSICBIO 1, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11. This reliable source [Vanguard] also passes WP:GNG and Verifiability because its a newspaper site according to what i read. Have a nice dayBlaze8724 (talk) 23:32, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
- Hello @Foxj: haven't heard your response.--Blaze8724 (talk) 14:10, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Blaze8724: I'd probably wait for the review. The process is quite backlogged at the moment. — foxj 14:48, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Hello @Foxj: haven't heard your response.--Blaze8724 (talk) 14:10, 17 October 2016 (UTC)