User talk:Fox/October 2011
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Fox. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
WikiCup 2011 September newsletter
We are on this year's home straight, with less than a month to go until the winner of the 2011 WikiCup will be decided. The fight for first place is currently being contested by 
Miyagawa (submissions), 
Hurricanehink (submissions) and 
Sp33dyphil (submissions), all of whom have over 200 points. This round has already seen multiple featured articles (1991 Atlantic hurricane season from Hurricanehink and Northrop YF-23 from Sp33dyphil) and a double-scoring featured list (Miyagawa's 1948 Summer Olympics medal table). The scores will likely increase far further before the end of the round on October 31 as everyone ups their pace. There is not much more to say- thoughts about next year's competition are welcome on the WikiCup talk page or the scoring talk page, and signups will open once a few things have been sorted out.
If you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 12:35, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Special Barnstar |
| Thank you for assisting me on IRC tonight; your help is greatly appreciated. I was going to give you a kitten, but I'm afraid you'd eat it. MJ94 (talk) 06:21, 2 October 2011 (UTC) |
What does that add?
Um... I don't know; maybe it tells people what the "AFL" is for the 99% of people who don't know what it is. -- tariqabjotu 08:24, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Dave1185...
...was commenting on a troll who was screwing around with my user page. Your block threat aimed at Dave1185 was out of line. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 11:43, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
JS update
Can you apply the fix you applied at User:Dr pda/prosesize.js also to User:Dr pda/prosesizebytes.js? The "bytes" version displays only in bytes, not in kilobytes. Thanks! --Lexein (talk) 18:49, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 3 October 2011
- News and notes: Italian Wikipedia shuts down over new privacy law; Wikimedia Sverige produce short Wikipedia films, Sue Gardner calls for empathy
- In the news: QRpedia launches to acclaim, Jimbo talks social media, Wikipedia attracts fungi, terriers and Greeks bearing gifts
- WikiProject report: Kia ora WikiProject New Zealand
- Featured content: Reviewers praise new featured topic: National treasures of Japan
- Arbitration report: Last call for comments on CheckUser and Oversight teams
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
A fox, for you.
As promised...
—Tom Morris (talk) 09:08, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Goldblooded (talk · contribs)
Have we stopped discussing unblocks with the blocking admin now? Spartaz Humbug! 14:34, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- *cough* This has been policy for Yoinks *cough* Are you implying that my block was obviously wrong? Spartaz Humbug! 15:09, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- I'm far from persuaded by the unblock request given the petulance and attitude shown in yesterday's request. That's a massive volte face in one day and I would have explored the commitment to the fine words before considering an unblock. It smelled strongly of being said for the sake of the unblock. Also, I seriously suggest you re-read the blocking policy if you are considering acting alone again. It always helps for blocks and unblocks to be done in the full appreciation of what the policy actually is... Spartaz Humbug! 16:01, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- I just noticed This which your unblock seems to have superceeded. Spartaz Humbug! 16:55, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- I'm far from persuaded by the unblock request given the petulance and attitude shown in yesterday's request. That's a massive volte face in one day and I would have explored the commitment to the fine words before considering an unblock. It smelled strongly of being said for the sake of the unblock. Also, I seriously suggest you re-read the blocking policy if you are considering acting alone again. It always helps for blocks and unblocks to be done in the full appreciation of what the policy actually is... Spartaz Humbug! 16:01, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
| As i said on my page , Thanks for reviewing my request, I will assure you it wont be in vain :) However; i oversaw your conversation with Spartaz; does that mean im going to be blocked again? :( Goldblooded (talk) 15:32, 8 October 2011 (UTC) |
ANI
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. CityOfSilver 21:17, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The conservatism of Wikimedians
- News and notes: Largest ever donation to WMF, final findings of editor survey released, 'Terms of use' heavily revised
- In the news: Uproar over Italian shutdown, the varying reception of BLP mischief, and Wikipedia's doctor-evangelist
- WikiProject report: The World's Oldest People
- Featured content: The weird and the disgusting
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low 
to High 
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:59, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
IRC
Per your quit message, your DYK was reviewed. --10:48, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- Guilt and I have a good relationship. :) Besides, you helped improve an article I had nommed for DYK. Easy enough to return the favour. Next time, ask me and I can try. :) Your article was pretty damned impressive and had a lot of work. Definitely looks like it deserves the GA nomination. --LauraHale (talk) 11:07, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
The slightest amount of guilt in my direction and I can be urged to help. Sometimes. And any help is appreciated. :) I tend to write like articles very bullet point fact, bullet point fact, bullet point fact. I find a source and jam all the information I can from it into an article. My writing has issues with being smooth and flowing. If your article was related to sport, I'd be tempted to do the GA... because I did Rugby union, but not for a video game one where I can't tell looking at sources what is reliable and not. :) --LauraHale (talk) 11:15, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- Since you clearly love sport as people with vertigo routinely base jump and jump out of planes and generally do all sorts of fun things at night, I recommend you do a peer review of Canberra Roller Derby League. :) LauraHale (talk) 11:25, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
RE: The List, Inc.
hey its kisuke from #wikipedia-en on that article i asked you to look at the deletion records for me, creating editor is kicking up a fuss, thought id give you a heads up, seeing as you may be asked about it here in the near future kthxbai Keastes know thyself 18:44, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 October 2011
- News and notes: Arabic Wikipedia gets video intros, Smithsonian gifts images, and WikiProject Conservatism scrutinized
- In the news: Why Wikipedia survives while others haven't; Wikipedia as an emerging social model; Jimbo speaks out
- WikiProject report: History in your neighborhood: WikiProject NRHP
- Featured content: Brazil's boom-time dreams of naval power: The ed17 explains the background to a new featured topic
ANI
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Hi Fox, I sent you an e-mail about a week ago. Have you seen it yet? Thanks. Acalamari 14:07, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Serbian villages
Nothing but browser tabs. If you really want to know I have a draft at User:Jaguar/Sandbox/3 and I copy and paste that using {{subst:PAGENAME}} in the articles. I go to List of places in Serbia and click all of the red links and use the browser tabs to create articles. Don't worry about the references, I have already discussed this with a sysop and we both agreed I can create any number of articles as long as they have a suitable reference. The discussion is on my talk page. Regards Jaguar (talk) 16:40, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Joe Danger
Hi. I commented again on that DYK nom page. --Orlady (talk) 12:42, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Joe Danger
 | On 24 October 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Joe Danger, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that PlayStation Network game Joe Danger was made entirely by a team of just four people? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joe Danger.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Joe Danger: The Movie
| On 25 October 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Joe Danger: The Movie, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the upcoming release Joe Danger: The Movie is a video game that parodies various Hollywood film scenes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joe Danger: The Movie.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
help for speedy delete: Kent Holtorf
Hi Fox. I have been in communication with Pesky on this also, as I think she originally flagged the article for deletion. I want to revise and repost but am trying to get to the bottom of what went wrong. I was modeling my article after another doctor page and maybe that was my oops (Joseph Mercola). Anywho, mine was deleted for being promotional and coming off like advertising. Which is truly not my purpose. I thought I'd rendered it neutral in tone. Pesky indicated I had too many references that were written directly by Holtorf himself. I counted my ratio to be 10 direct sources sited vs. 16 secondary sources sited. To compare, Mercola's page has 14 direct vs. 32 secondary. Not too different. How can I clean this up to qualify as encyclopedic? Your help would be greatly appreciated! 98.196.101.245 (talk) 17:16, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- Hi there, sorry I've taken a while to respond to this. Respectfully, citing almost purely the man's own work in an article which sounds almost résumé-style is not the route to take. What you want to do is establish notability without leaning too far in one direction. A good guide is available here if you like, and that is literally all you need. I'll happily assist with other concerns. — Joseph Fox 12:12, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 October 2011
- From the editors: A call for contributors
- Opinion essay: There is a deadline
- Interview: Contracting for the Foundation
- WikiProject report: Great WikiProject Logos
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion; request for amendment on Climate Change case
- Technology report: WMF launches coding challenge, WMDE starts hiring for major new project
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:09, 29 October 2011 (UTC)