User talk:Fovezer

fovezer, at least read the account of an unembedded journalist like Rolando Segura of Telesur, who was at the scene of the massacre in Majer http://rolandotelesur.blogspot.com/2011/08/la-masacre-de-majer.html NATO OUT of LIBYA

It's called POV-pushing. The former Libyan regime claimed it was a massacre of 85 civilians, while NATO and the rebels claim it was a strike on a military camp. The current paragraph explains the events just fine and from a neutral POV. Fovezer (talk) 22:18, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-gaddafi forces

It's against Wikipedia policy to remove reliably sourced information. This is not a question of consensus; neither members nor yourself have brought forward a case to the talk page. Both users have a history of editing with disregard for standing policy. If you have an opinion on the matter there is a talkpage for discussion in which you may voice your opinions.

Revert the page again and I will file a case for edit warring to the relevant authority. -- Secondat of Orange (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:21, 26 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

File:Austrianroundel.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Austrianroundel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 00:47, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hungaryair.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hungaryair.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 06:03, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Hungarianairforce.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:Hungarianairforce.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:16, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hungarianairforce.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hungarianairforce.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:10, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]