User talk:FourMastab

March 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 18:52, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FourMastab (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All I wanted was to ask why I was banned from Wiktionary. My talk page there was disabled, I couldn't ask there. So I came here. I'll admit my message was curt, but it broke no rules. It was not a personal attack regardless of what it seems like. I'm being denied the right to appeal over there and I just can't be denied that right here. Please. This is unfair. I have no way to contact anyone that's staff. I need help.

Decline reason:

These are two different projects. If you have had your talk page access disabled over there, you shouldn't come here to complain about it. And this was totally rude. We don't tolerate that sort of thing here. Yamla (talk) 19:45, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Widr and Yamla: This account is a sockpuppet; see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BedrockPerson/Archive. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 20:16, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

UTC)}}

@Widr, Yamla, and Metaknowledge: No I’m not. Also, the page you linked hasn’t been updated since last month. What investigation or proof do you have of this claim? FourMastab (talk) 21:22, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We did a CheckUser investigation. Your lies are tiring, and I will not respond to you here any more. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 02:50, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Widr, Yamla, and Metaknowledge: Who is "we"? Where did you do this? When did you do this? What proof do you have that you did this? If you simply did a CheckUser, why did you even post a link to the sockpuppet page, knowing that no report was made there and you did everything yourself? Many questions. FourMastab (talk) 03:53, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

::@Widr, Yamla, and Metaknowledge: Hello? I'm waiting? FourMastab (talk) 00:41, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop pinging people. If you want to request an unblock, request an unblock. I've declined your request and have nothing further to say, except if you keep pinging people, you'll lose access to this talk page. --Yamla (talk) 11:28, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: So, if I want to contribute, can I just create another account and use that? FourMastab (talk) 14:12, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously not. And now you have to wait six months to access this page again, as I warned you would happen. --Yamla (talk) 15:22, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]