User talk:Fountainofyouth

Welcome to my talk page. I welcome respectful comments related to the ongoing preservation of a neutral net and an informed and impartial Wikipedia. Fountainofyouth (talk)

Fountainofyouth, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Fountainofyouth! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

MoneyLion Comments

Your article is all about what it sells. You tell us nothing in the text about the number of employees (unsourced in the infobox), turnover or profit
Crunchbase is never suitable as a ref, and some of your other refs are just quoting the company managers, or are obvious press releases, neither are independent third-party sources. For example, the ref for They also reached five million customers in 2019 is the CEO saying so, hardly an independent source Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:02, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak: Thanks very much for the feedback. I was trying to align the page to similar Neobanks in the space (Acorns, Varo) but no doubt those pages need additional work too. I've made some changes to the page; included revenue and no. of staff in the infobox. I removed the Crunchbase citation and accept your point on that. Removed the 2019 reference to a one of their key products too. Added in a section for business funding with a citation. If you could let me know if you think we're moving in the right direction that would be much appreciated. Fountainofyouth (talk) 19:11, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I made these changes, please check. I guess at some stage you'll have to submit it for review and see what reviewers think. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:37, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak: Thanks again - the changes look good to me. Will get the page submitted for review. Fountainofyouth (talk) 05:06, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:MoneyLion has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:MoneyLion. Thanks! davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 15:31, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MoneyLion (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We require substantial 3rd party reliable published sources, not press releases or blogs or postings or mere notices

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MoneyLion and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:MoneyLion, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 03:02, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:MoneyLion

Hello, Fountainofyouth. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:MoneyLion, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:MoneyLion

Hello, Fountainofyouth. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MoneyLion".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]