User talk:Foundationforjustice

January 2009

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Johnson vs. Buckle, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Irn (talk) 05:07, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Johnson vs. Buckle. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 18:13, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Johnson vs. Buckle. Thingg ^⊕^⊗ 18:21, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to Johnson vs. Buckle could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that this is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. RJaguar3 | u | t 18:23, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia as long as the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you believe that a legal action is warranted, you may contact our information team at info-en@wikimedia.org and they may forward it to our legal counsel or a more appropriate venue. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

NawlinWiki (talk) 18:25, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Foundationforjustice. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. RJaguar3 | u | t 18:26, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Foundationforjustice (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

76.15.65.123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Foundationforjustice". The reason given for Foundationforjustice's block is: "Making legal threats".

Blocking administrator: NawlinWiki (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Procedural decline - incorrect unblock request. You have not inadvertently been caught in an autoblock, you have been specifically blocked for making legal threats. You will not be unblocked until the legal matter has been resolved or you withdraw your threat of litigation. WilliamH (talk) 15:07, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]