User talk:Formerlychucks

January 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Wojak, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 16:34, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll admit it, i didnt have sources for that Formerlychucks (talk) 16:43, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Clickhole, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:36, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ridiculous Formerlychucks (talk) 13:30, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't 4chan or ED. If the disruptive behavior continue sactions may be issued. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 14:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

“this isn’t 4chan or ED” then why was @JPxG made an admin? He frequently uses these dogwhistles in talk pages. HaytchT (talk) 01:14, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, he's not breaking any rules it seems. Formerlychucks (talk) 10:33, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@OhNoitsJamie: You're a *******. 2.99.113.34 (talk) 13:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[I AM NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PERSON] Formerlychucks (talk) 13:41, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Formerlychucks here, I am a BIPOC trans queen btw. though 2A00:F41:28BA:8C47:1531:530A:8966:6610 (talk) 13:52, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly note

In this edit, you change a named citation and replaced it with a new citation. If you are using the visual diff view, you can change to the wikitext view to see what the visual editor did. I just tried using the visual editor and it looks like it says This reference is defined in a template or other generated block, and for now can only be edited in source mode. Usually, we add additional parameters to the existing reference, but in this case it wasn't possible with the visual editor. I've fixed it, but please take note of it the next time you encounter a source like this. Note that there's also an online tool that can help you automate this process of rescuing dead sources with the Internet Archive here. Let me know if you have any questions. Happy editing! 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 12:59, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Formerlychucks (talk) 13:05, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I'm SchreiberBike. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of mammals of Yemen have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Just don't do things like that. You know better. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 15:14, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Eve. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 20:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then, i understand. Formerlychucks (talk) 20:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The_Lawnmower_Man_(film). Formerlychucks, please cease all of your disruptive editing this instant. You have been given multiple chances, more than the average vandal, yet you continue to deface Wikipedia. Based on your edit history, you have made multiple references to Soyjaks, and on the Lawnmower Man, you made reference to the following:

~~TND - A racist joke stemming from the eradication of black people~~

~~Cobson - A Soyjak variant from 4channel's /qa/~~

~~"spine-tingling bone-chilling gut-wrenching" - A reference to Soyboys~~

~~"Kang" - a racist reference to the "way black people talk" according to users of your website~~

~~You are clearly a vandal and not here to build an encyclopedia. If you continue, you will be taken to WP:ANI and the appropriate actions will be taken. Thank you.~~ LOLHWAT (talk) 11:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your warning is misplaced as Formerlychucks did not introduce the vandalism. Now they didn't remove it when they edited the article either, but its not blatant disruption is what I am saying. Another note: this edit per MOS:OVERLINK is not constructive.

But I think Formerlychucks isn't intentionally trying to to bring harm here, at least not from their edit history as of writing this comment. So let them edit and enough with these threats already. But as far as people from imageboards go, some of them might just be dedicated trolls that try to be subtle with their sneaky vandalism over a long time period, but we'll see. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 13:50, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your clarification. Vandalism is not the purpose of my account.

Also, regarding the "unconstructive edit", the supposed Japanese release lacked a citation and i added a ^{[citation needed]} template to it. It needed that. Formerlychucks (talk) 14:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to the excessive linking. Read the link that I provided. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 14:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, my bad. The diff highlighted that racist part, and I mistakenly thought he placed it. Sorry! LOLHWAT (talk) 16:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You were using the feature for comparing selected revisions, right? Formerlychucks (talk) 11:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. LOLHWAT (talk) 12:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. KNHaw ^(talk) 19:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]