User talk:Forivall

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Forivall. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! WanderingWanda (talk) 21:14, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@WanderingWanda: And a belated reply! As a hopeful distraction to your current arbitration stuff, I've noticed a few people use what appear to be color tags, like {tq|...} (iirc), which seems to have a similar colloquial meaning to the "greentext" convention on other sites. Is there a reference for what this, and other similar conventions mean? I went through a few of the meta pages on talk pages, and didn't come across it (tho i did figure out how to ping you, which is nice) •forivall•^irc•L and Q• 11:37, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
179	Gender essentialism (talk)	Add sources
17	Old Order Movement (talk)	Add sources
572	Transphobia (talk)	Add sources
4,817	LGBT (talk)	Add sources
28	The African Church (talk)	Add sources
16	George Blaurock (talk)	Add sources
8	Mainstream Baptists (talk)	Cleanup
42	Gay media (talk)	Cleanup
38	Schwenkfelder Church (talk)	Cleanup
212	Feminist views on transgender topics (talk)	Expand
101	Lesbian bar (talk)	Expand
249	LGBT culture (talk)	Expand
61	The Woman-Identified Woman (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
644	Butch and femme (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
48	Healthcare and the LGBT community (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
192	Mixed-orientation marriage (talk)	Merge
20	Clannism (talk)	Merge
241	Social model of disability (talk)	Merge
87	HKDF (talk)	Wikify
60	Womyn's land (talk)	Wikify
95	Christianity in the ante-Nicene period (talk)	Wikify
4	Khush: South Asian Lesbian and Gay Association (talk)	Orphan
2	Alonso de Tejeda (talk)	Orphan
2	Benet Perceval (talk)	Orphan
71	Hershey's Cookies 'n' Creme (talk)	Stub
75	Swoops (talk)	Stub
49	Reese's Fast Break (talk)	Stub
165	Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub
67	Message authentication (talk)	Stub
22	E.L. Fudge (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:18, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.