User talk:Forget it.

Welcome!

Hello, Forget it., and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck or looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Help Desk, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, or ask the people around you for help -- good Wikipedians don't bite the newcomers. Keep an open mind and listen for advice, but don't hesitate to be bold when editing!

If you'd like to respond to this message, or ask any questions, feel free to leave a message at my talk page!

Once you've become a more experienced Wikipedian, you may wish to take a moment to visit these pages:

Best of luck to you, and happy editing!

Luna Santin 10:40, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit(s) to Minarchism

My apologies for being so forward, but you should be aware that your first contribution [1] makes you look like a sockpuppet of User:Irgendwer -- it's very unusual for a brand new editor's first contribution to be a reversion in such a matter, and unfortunately the number of such first edits at that page has been growing, which in turn unfortunately makes your edit look suspicious. If you are a sockpuppet, you should be aware that the 3RR rule applies to a person as a whole -- using multiple accounts does not allow for more reversions. If you're not a sockpuppet, and I do hope you're not, I apologize for the intrusion, but you should really use article talk pages, in the future, to resolve such content disputes. Thanks for your time. I look forward to seeing you become a helpful member. :) Luna Santin 20:56, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attack at Talk:Minarchism

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Luna Santin 21:16, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The truth is no personal attack. --Forget it. 21:19, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That, in turn, could probably be interpreted as another attack. At the very least, it shows you don't take policy seriously. Please refrain from any additional personal attacks, or I may be forced to ask for administrator intervention. Thank you. Luna Santin 21:23, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do what you want but stop vandalizing. --Forget it. 21:25, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When have I vandalized? Please see WP:VAND; content disputes do not qualify as vandalism. Luna Santin 21:26, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are vandalizing the Minarchism article. --Forget it. 21:28, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where? When? Please be specific. How is providing a source to satisfy a {{citeneeded}} tag vandalism? Luna Santin 21:32, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How do you have anything satisfied? You could also use www.catholic.org as reference. You are very stupid to ask such nonsense. --Forget it. 21:37, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Again, content disputes are not vandalism and should be referred to the article's talk page. And, since you're not letting up with the personal attacks:

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. Luna Santin 21:40, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When you call your nonsense "content" and when you want to disput about nonsense then you must be very stupid or you must be a troll. I have no other explanation. And I revert you. --Forget it. 07:19, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you may be blocked for disruption. Luna Santin 07:31, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Forget it. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Given below

Decline reason:

Fairly clear you are a sockpuppet. Personal attacks are unacceptable, sockpuppet or not. Trolling is unacceptable, sockpuppet or not. The block is valid for the latter two alone, even without allegations of sockpuppetry. So the block stays. ➨ ЯEDVERS 16:23, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

to: "Sockpuppet/Troll"

I am no "reincarnation" of an existing banned user. That is wrong. Or you must have banned an old user account. I don't know

I thought it is a personal attack to call users "Troll". It would be interesting how you have come to this opinion. --Forget it. 08:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]