Yes, it is considered vandalism if you remove a warning from your talk page. From WP:VAND: Removing warnings for vandalism or other issues from one's talk page may also be considered vandalism.. (see also Wikipedia:Removing warnings). Should somebody do this, you can use, in order, templates {{Wr0}}, {{Wr}}, and {{Wr2}}. If the vandal should strike again, you can list him/her on WP:AIV. AndyZt20:35, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever code you're using from your signature, please replace {{timestamp}} with {{subst:timestamp}}. Otherwise your signature continues to display the current time! -- SCZenz07:51, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just out of interest, could you please tell me why you completely reverted the addition of 9cds' RfA to WP:RFA? Cheers, — FireFox • 11:29, 09 June '06
Sorry but that really is no reason to full revert his addition. As it turns out, you ended up reverting yourself, and then moving the RfA to the top of the list anyway. — FireFox • 14:49, 09 June '06
Ok, I'll leave this issue. Please remember to provide a useful edit summary in the future, explaining the reason for the revert. Thanks, — FireFox • 14:53, 09 June '06
Just one more thing. Please don't do this again, as the RfA had barely started, let-alone failed. — FireFox • 16:17, 09 June '06
You commented that I had added nonsense to Wikipedia and that was considered Vandalism. Erm what did I write because the only thing I wrote was about Nick's name being Shirm not Shim...
When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. --Cyde↔Weys17:42, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, ForestH2/Talkpage, and thank you for voting with strong support on my recent RfA! With a final vote of 84/1/4, I have now been entrusted with the mop, bucket and keys. I will be slowly acclimating myself to my new tools over the next months, but welcome any and all feedback and suggestions on how I might be able to use them to help the project. Thanks again! Kukini15:15, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi ForestH2.... We've worked together before so I wanted to bring this to your attention in case you were not aware. In the history of Treehouse (Drake and Josh episode) it's clear that you have been repeatedly reverting. This article went through AfD and consensus was to merge. It's probably not a good thing to revert content back in without first getting consensus that the merge should be reversed. Excessive reversion, especially against consensus, can be detrimental to the project. This may be old news, apologies if it's already being addressed (I became aware of it because of this thread User_talk:Lar#Article_Un-redirect on my talk page. ++Lar: t/c16:19, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Calm down? What are you on about? I have not got a problem, and I've had enough with your insolence - everytime I make an edit you try and contradict me - IMDB is a fan based site any one can add anything. I have read the book (the centaurs aren't in it - except for the ending, which is very unlikely that they'll use live actors for). Evilphoenix (conveniently) no longer sings in - so how can we ask him? Im trying to help this article by stating sources that are verifiable. Foxearth 00:25, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Stop being so ridiculous, did I ever call Wikipedia the best site in the world? No! The two websites are different kettles of fish, IMDB doesn't have souces to back up statements Wikipedia does, I will report this if it goes any further, this petty bickering is beyond belief... Foxearth 00:30, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia does site sources - you find little nit picks with anyone who tries to do their job properly - I'm trying to maintain this website, your last comment makes no sense and you are not seeing the full picture - I disagree with your views leave the page as it is.. Foxearth 00:33, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
It seems you are threatening others with blocks because they don't come round to your way of thinking. I believe we can sort this out rationally if you listened to my side of events, because they are more appropriate. Just because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't mean you have the authority to block them, you harrass me with every edit I make, and it stops right now. Also, what's with repeating the same message 3 times on my talk page. You are not god Forest, I know this may be difficult for you to believe, but you need to stop creating so much fuss... and denying that you are in the wrong Foxearth
Please stop sending me threatening messages. I do not believe that you have the authority to ban me from Wikipedia, nor that even a casual glance at my contributions would support such a move.Rhindle The Red00:47, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what the issues are, though it looks like a content issue. Why is that box such a area of debate? Is it not verifiable? Rx StrangeLove01:03, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello ForestH2, and thank you for your support at my request for adminship, which ended with an awe-inspiring 86/1/2 result. I plan to do much with my shiny new tools - but I'll start slow and learn the ropes at first. Please deluge me with assignments and requests - I enjoy helping out. For Mother Russia!! - CrazyRussiantalk/contribs/email04:59, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
ForestH2, thank you very much for your support in my recent Request for adminship, it passed with a final tally of (65/3/3) - which I find both amazing and humbling. I wish I had time to thank everyone personally, but I'm afraid all I can offer is this token of my gratitude. I hope to live up to your expectations/hopes. If at any stage you need to contact me, for help or a request or to point out a mistake in my conduct, please make sure to tell me on my talk page. --Fir000208:22, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is to UkPaolo only. If you can't figure out what a 3RR is I am not excatly sure why you are an admin. I am leaving Wikipedia as I have had it with everyone and after 12 hours is finished I am going to report you to a place (not sure where yet). For you not to know what a 3RR is, well I'm not sure why you are an admin. I deserve to be unblocked and after the 12 hours or when I am unblocked I am going to report UkPaolo to the admins and then leave Wikipedia. ForestH2
Thank you. Are you an admin? Please unblock me. If you look at the page he thinks I overdid the 3RR I didn't. All I need to do is post to Esperenza/Alerts saying I'm leaving Wikipedia and then do a couple things with my talk page. ForestH2
Could you place as Ezperenza/Alerts that I'm leaving Wikipedia please? I'll post at the admins noticeboard later or maybe even Requests for Arbatration or even WP:AIV. ForestH2
Hmm. Just looked at the 3RR conversation above. If you're only blocked for 12 hours, why not just wait it out, and then do whatever posting you wanted to do? It's only a few more hours... Waitak15:07, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
But I didn't actully revert a page more than 4 times. I'll wait out though. --ForestH2
I'm sorry to hear that you don't feel that you want to edit anymore - I don't know what caused it, but I wish you luck on your endeavors, and hope to see you back here someday. -- Natalya23:55, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Forest, as you know, I've been away. I'm quite sorry to see that you've left or at least you won't be full-time editing anymore. I don't have the time now but I hope when I get back we can settle this well. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 16:54, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That's good to hear. I hope that everything that you had problems with can be solved. I'm sent an update to IMDb discussing the HBP film page, because now they've added Rupert Grint, not even as "in negotiations", as if he's completely signed on, which is utterly untrue. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 11:37, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Forest, look I know we've had our differences in the past, but at the end of the day it's been great editing alongside you. All the best, hope to see you around again some day... Foxearth 04:45, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
It's so sad that you are leaving I've only been a member for a little bit, but you've been one of the most helful people to me i hope you come back to Wikipedia. :( kh1 fiend20:21, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Came here to thank you for supporting my RfA, but I'm surprised that you've left. Feel free to message me or e-mail me if you need to chat or vent. Take care -- Samirधर्म08:05, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I don't think I understand the message you left on my talk page. I've checked the tagging I did of Fiurama and it looks okay to me. I believe the article is empty per CSD A3. Could you explain a little? Thanks, Gwernol01:05, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I can't figure out what the nature of the warning is that you are revert-warring over on Daniel5127's talk page. Could you show me some diffs demonstating this vandalism, and stop fighting over his talk page for a while? —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 03:50, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Forest tends to believe anyone who disagrees with him to be a vandal - it is totally unacceptable, and because I was right over a matter concerning an unreliable source on a Harry Potter film page: I was called 'lazy' for not looking up a source which I didn't know existed - it's totally uncivil and I don't believe he should be an editor if he can't understand rashional explainations. Foxearth 06:24, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Hmm, if it was a specific date, such as 9th August 2006, I'd say on, but, in retrospect, in is probably more suitable here. There's no real point in reverting the page so many times, though- we could offer to help with his English, and perhaps correct his userpage for him, but I'd only do this with his consent- some users get (perhaps understandably) upset at repeated edits to their userpage.
Do you know the IP address that's been making the edits by any chance?
(Comment reposted at appropriate page/title here changed for spelling, previously grammer).
It'll be a shame to see you leave- good luck with whatever you'll be doing!
EvocativeIntrigueTALK | EMAIL has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
Thank you for your support in my RfA, which ended with the result of (74/0/0). If there is anything I can help with feel free to ask. Also, if there is anything I am doing wrong, please point that out as well. I look forward to working with you in the future.
Thanks for voting! Hello ForestH2/Talkpage, and thank you so much for voting in my recent RfA. I am pleased to inform you that it passed with a final tally of (119/1/3), into the WP:100, so I have now been cleared for adminship and will soon be soaring above the clouds. I was overjoyed, shocked, and humbled by the tally, and, most importantly, all the support. Thank you. If there is ever anything you need, you know where you can find me. Take care.
Hi ForestH2. I'm very sorry to see that you're leaving this project. Though I don't really know you, I've seen you around, and it seems like you're a good, honest, and hard working user, and those are the hardest users to lose. I wish you luck in your future, and assure you that you will be missed here. Yours, The Halo (talk) 00:43, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Forest. As I mentioned my problem about two weeks ago, We must apologize for fighting in Wikipedia. As you know, Personal Attack is unacceptable in Wikipedia. So, I just laughed that you sent me message that I vandalized my page that I reverted your message. So, Do not play in Vandalism Report. Wikipedia is not place for personal attack, and playground. That's my advice to you. *~Daniel~*23:15, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's OK. Next time, If you'are uncivil, I will report admin for your bad behaviour. Please, Demonstrate good behaviour from now on. Yes, I will put my signature on my user page. My page doesn't need to be protected because my page get vandalized. Occasionally. Not frequently, sometimes. But Thanks you for deciding to nominate me for admin. But, I need more experiences in Wikipedia for becoming Admin. *~Daniel~*01:34, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Arg, you and Daniel5127 going at it again? Regarding [1] -- why are you asking him to add a talk and contribs link to his sig? There's no policy, guideline, or suggestion that I know of that requires such a thing... if there were, that would be the default, built-in signature! —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 01:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Might i ask what i removed from wikipedia that you are threatening to block me with because it is considered vandalism? -Jürgens
I'm sorry, it was not meant as an attack, but i had added something which he then deleted and called vandalism. His responce seemed rude from my point of view. I will try in the future to more carefully word my responces --Jürgens
Thanks for supoorting me in my request for adminship. Unfortunently, I have withdrawn, because I don't want too many people against me if 5 opposed within 10 minutes. I will try again in the future. -AMK15203:11, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Stay away from his page. Those edits you removed are neither vandalism nor personal attacks, and removing them is unhelpful and confusing. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 15:54, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for joining the to-be WikiProject Iceland! :) I didn't know you had an interest in it. But how can you work to make the project a better place if your not gonna edit wikipedia anymore? And plus, you edited after you said you wouldn't anymore. I'm confused. íslenskahurikein #12(samtal)13:35, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Forest, I'm not going through this again - I removed the IMDB source because it was irrelevant and completley out of context, the sooner you realize I've done nothing wrong, the better Foxearth 23:35, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
I removed the speedy delete tag on the above page, since it seems to be a legitimate article on a Roman-Catholic bishop, albeit only a stub. If you still want it deleted, please list it at AfD or re-tag it. Travelbird15:00, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Their really pointless edits. I tried to fix the fact that the "Cuaron" of Alfonso Cuaron was partly blocked by the sidebar. I failed, though, so nothing is different. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Raditzu (talk • contribs) .
Sorry for interrupting you, I have seen your message many times in someone's discussion's page. But You just copied whole thing. I'm so sorry to say that your message is so confusing like you copied someone's message, not only response. Next time, Please only put your response, after you reply some Wikipedian's message in this discussion page. *~Daniel~*00:27, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know. I thought it was good to also put the question or comment given when your reply. And I'm sure how it is confusing. It's good to put the question or comment and the answer so I can know the question and the answer and you can remember the question more easily and compare it to the comment. ForestH200:45, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Were either of you two talking to me? The above exchange appears to be a private conversation that has spilled out on to my Talk page by mistake. Just in case you were talking to me and wanted my views on Talk page etiquette, you can find official guidance at Wikipedia:Talk_page#How_to_keep_a_two-way_conversation_readable. I prefer to keep contributors' exchanges in one place for ease of reference at a later date. Please be civil when trying to tell other editors and administrators how to conduct themselves with other users! Policy is very easy to find using Google's advanced search features. (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:35, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I was reading Daniel's message and I kind of confused why it's confusing to have the question/comment and the answer. Yeah I was talking to you. What do you mean civil? I think my first comment was civil. Wasn't it? Or were you talking to Daniel? ForestH2 | + | √ | -17:45, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I was referring to Daniel - I should have made that clear, apologies. It reads as if I am being told what to do without any prior discussion, most confusing! Still, the guidelines are there for you to refer to. (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:52, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I noticed that Daniel never communicated with and went through your contributions and just decided to give you the note. I sort of wonder why it's so confusing. And I really can't even understand his message because of his grammer ForestH2 | + | √ | -17:54, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from Rock 'n' Roller Coaster. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. robertvan118:21, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, my talk page is certainly filled with Harry Potter edit confusions. Anyway, it is confirmed on the main Wikipedia page for the film that Kreacher is included, as he is CGI. Therefore I got rid of that since he is confirmed to be in the movie, though he is still uncast. The intro to that section might cause confusion. But, I am an idiot, so I might of messed it up somehow...? - Raditzu19:46, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have a link above here that leads to your talk page, and that's where all the comments are, so I was wondering if I should move this to there? - Raditzu21:06, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, okay. So you want me to just leave this here? Raditzu
As much as I try right here in Wikipedia, I try to make sure all of my edits are as Neutral as I can, that all my edits/talks/misc are clean, that I make sure that I'm not committing any copyright/licensing issues, that I try to keep my cool, that I try to curb all of my emotions, that I assume that people are editing in what I prefer to call "clean faith" (It's basically same as Good Faith, but except it's done with a bit more carefulness and with more detail-orientation), that I watch what I'm saying in a talk page in Wikipedia, that Wikipedia is NOT CENSORED as long as it's done in good and credible faith, and that I try to resolve editing conflicts at the most appropriate level I can. I also try to make sure plagiarism is kept to an absolute minimum, but I also believe in professional diplomacy as well.
This is probably gonna become a long one, so if you want to know what my beliefs as a Wikipedian are, you should e-mail me at markkim31 at comcast dot net. I might be a bit more militarily disciplined than all Wikipedians are, but I really have an unstable inner self that as I try to follow Wikipedia guidelines, and if someone is trying to hurt my feelings, then I tend to lose it.
Anyway, thanks for letting me know that I don't act like a child. Everybody's style here in Wikipedia is diffrent, but as much as I try, I try to be very careful here in Wikipedia. — The Evil in Everyone (U * T/R * CTD) 21:23, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sadly, IMDb has said nothing. Impossible to get in touch with. Second, I've heard nothing re Nick Shim, though I didn't put it through deletion review, as it didn't meet the crieteria. I simply placed a message on the talk page. Third, I'll take a look at those edits. Lastly, great eye for Maggie Smith. I didn't see that on any of the major fan sites. And there is absolutely nothing about Dobby that I know of, I have no clue what these "recent rumors" are. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 16:09, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I had to revert your edits. The article doesn't say anything about taking time off from Harry Potter. Instead, it says, "She wants to do the play in between her Harry Potter filming commitments." I don't think that necessarily says anything about not doing HBP; I would think if anything it suggests that she would come back; however, it's not much right now. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 19:20, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Forest, I hope I don't sound annoying, but you telling me to sign my posts with the four tildes is getting on my nerves. Please, you don't need to write a note on my talk page just because I didn't sign. First of all, I haven't been on Wikipedia for two weeks. Second of all, the standard style of your note – the form quality to it – just bugs me. Come on, you know that I know to sign my messages with the correct signatures. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 19:20, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No, it has nothing to do with it being troubling, it's that, as I said above, being away from Wikipedia for two weeks, and not dealing with typing "~~~~" makes you forget. As I slowly adjust to my normal lifestyle, a friendly reminder to get me back into the habit of using the signature option is much preferable over "When adding a comment on a talk page please sign your name with ~~~~ 4 tidles. Happy editing!" I hope you understand. And IMO, {{unsigned}} should really be for users who post and are likely not to revisit the page again soon, but where the signature is important. If the user can come back and sign it, then I think it should be done, especially if it can be proved in the edit history that it actually was that user. Anyway, this is a stupid discussion to be having. I just hope that you consider what is not an easy transition back to my normal life. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 02:42, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Is it really protected? Obviously I suppose I couldn't find out, as if it were available for anyone to edit it would be me. I suppose all users' monobooks are like that. Haven't the foggiest, really. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 02:49, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Um, don't really know, but I don't really have an interest in knowing either. LOL, I suppose I could just post while logged out, but it lets go a sense of my privacy… anyway, I haven't the faintest idea. And thanks for the heads-up and the compliment. I really think you should remove the thing about you leaving as you seem to be up to normal posting levels… --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 03:07, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'll look into it. But as I recall, Harry does note that Crabbe and Goyle look a bit left out. Let me go check the text. Have fun in New York, my home, even if it is on business… --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 20:06, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, JK released an old sketch of all the teacher's names on it, c. POA time, with "Cuthbert Binns" written on it, but some other stuff on the page is not canon, as it was changed, so… technically, no. His name never appears in the books. If Cuthbert is noted, it should be attached to the bit about being released on a non-canon sheet of paper. See here. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 20:40, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The Snitch is not a reputable source, and, as the information appears nowhere else, I'm afraid we can't accept it. By the way, I don't think Harry and William Melling are related, but I dunno. Pretty cool about passing HM – what did you think? --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 02:01, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the barnstar, hun - if you return completely, I've been granted all I really really wanted ;) it's great to have you around, my dear Forest! *Smoochie!* Phædriel♥tell me - 00:38, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Forest, for your support in my RfA. I appreciate your trust and support, and I will do my best to further help this great encyclopædia and community of ours. If there is anything that you feel I can do to help, please let me know. -- Avi22:55, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Eh....Paolo the Shyed Ahmed article was recreated. 15:34, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Forest — it's good to see you still editing. Thanks for letting me know about the Syed Ahmed article, but please be aware that the currently refers to a different individual than the previously deleted article. I've added a note to the talk page to try and clarify this.
By the way, I've removed the semi-protection on your talk page, since there doesn't seem to be a current need for this (user talk pages are rarely protected, except for blocked users, since otherwise not everybody can leave messages for you).
All right. Uh...yeah. On the 16th I left Wikipedia for a week in a half (a little annoyed) If I plan to leave Wikipedia for another long period of time, I will request my talk page protected. As you can see I am currently away but editing when I get a chance. And uh....could you watch Touth? He broke the 3RR twice in the last three days and I've yet to recieve a block for him after posting at WP:AIV Back from your wikibreak yet? Happy editing. ForestH2 | + | √+ | √ | √- | -16:25, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough! I'm also away most of the time, but editing when I get a chance, so no my Wikibreak isn't really over - I'm still not here anywhere near as much as I was! Regarding Touth, it WP:AIV isn't really approiate for reporting 3RR violations: you should post details to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR. └ UkPaolo/talk┐16:29, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
And no IP has any really important messages to give to me, but still it's good my talk page was unprotected. Please keep my userpage protected. Oh and can an image be on a userpage? On Foxearth, you said it was only used to demonstrate the article in question.
Regarding protection of your user talk page, per Wikipedia:Protection policy "talk pages and user talk pages are not protected as a rule, except in extreme circumstances." I'm somewhat confused by your message as to whether or not you are requesting me to protect or unprotect your talk page, but per our policy I see no reason to keep your talk page protected (or semi protected). You can never be sure a new user (or IP) will want to contact you.
Regarding images, images uploaded to Wikipedia under a free license may, of course, be used on user pages. However, images uploaded under "fair use grounds" may not be used on user pages (since the use there does not constitute fair use). As an example, a screenshot from a Harry Potter film could be deemed fair use if used to illustrate an article on the Harry Potter film, but fair use could not be claimed if this screenshot was used to illustrate an article on broomsticks, or if it was used on my user page to show that I am a Harry Potter fan. Hope that makes sense. You can find the policy at WP:FU, in particular note "Fair use images should be used only in the article namespace. Used outside article space, they are often enough not covered under the fair use doctrine." └ UkPaolo/talk┐16:43, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I never did Prisoner of Azkaban. Right now I'm extremely busy and only had time for one, so I did the one that I had just watched. Anyways, all edits to the summary are warmly received. I just put in what I thought people should know, but, yeah. - Raditzu23:30, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
First, sorry for the boo-boo. I left one comment at your archive page (which is what I'm gonna do).
Now how do you archive? I've seen the "How to Archive" pages (mainly advanced Wikipedians do that) but I never archive before. This is a complex technique that I might want to master so that in the event I have to zero out the talk page, I can actually make an "episode" to save as an archive.
Hello there, I was wondering if you would please modify your signature to conform to the guidelines laid out at Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages. The general guidelines are that signatures shouldn't contain images, they shouldn't contain unnecessary internal links or any external links, and they shouldn't be unnecessarily long in Wiki source. The reasoning for this final bit is that overly long signatures tend to overwhelm the actual comments in edit mode, making it hard to track down and respond to specific comments. You can fix your signature by removing any images and external links, any unnecessary links (like links to Wikipedian organizations, articles, or subpages in userspace), and removing excessive color, font, and formatting code. Thank you. --Cyde↔Weys21:36, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Since you re-joined us, could you remove those msgs on your talk page and user page that you left wikipedia last month?--Kchase02T23:38, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Can you tell Fbv65edel why I reverted the edit about M. Night and the director being the film? It was because I didn't have to time to reasearch and I hate speculation. Treebark(talk)23:58, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not a problem. The way the anon worded it anyway, it sounded fake. If you're going to add stuff to Wikipedia, at least make it sound real! LOL. No really, it's fine, it actually reminded me to include it, as I had seen the news but putting it into the article completely evaded me. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 02:37, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What have I removed that is considered to be vandalism. I NEVER vandalize pages, all I do is keep them up-to-date. Show me an example please. A rather miffed Cs-wolves19:41, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I was keeping the Los Angeles Dodgers roster UP-TO-DATE. Therefore, adding the date of today, 13th July 2006. Why did you change it back to the 6th?? Cs-wolves19:43, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Seems strange that its considered vandalism. I was only updating to reflect on after the All-Star Game. But, i must be wrong. Oh well. :( thanks for the warning, Cs-wolves21:37, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
lved anything? Psychomelodic (people think User:Psychomelodic/me edit) 21:39, 15 July 2006 (UTC)