User talk:ForestArmor586

ForestArmor586, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi ForestArmor586! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Where in Time Is Carmen Sandiego? (TV show) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Where in Time Is Carmen Sandiego? (TV show) was changed by ForestArmor586 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865966 on 2018-08-20T19:20:35+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:20, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at List of Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn episodes, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. You are using boldface inappropriately, as well as all caps, in the above article. Read MOS:BOLD about where it is appropriate, and where it is not, to use boldface. MPFitz1968 (talk) 14:54, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the guideline MOS:TENSE indicates that most material must be written in the present tense, particularly works of fiction, including TV episode summaries. You are not adhering to that guideline either. MPFitz1968 (talk) 14:56, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn episodes.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: List of Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn episodes was changed by ForestArmor586 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.859298 on 2018-08-30T14:59:44+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:59, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Luk ^talk 14:36, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ForestArmor586, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Amaury (talk | contribs) 03:56, 7 September 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:18, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]