User talk:Forenglishcomp

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Intelligent Design Does Not Meet the Criteria of a Scientific Theory.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Andrew³²⁷ 17:08, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm Jamesx12345. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Creation and evolution in public education, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. James^x1 2345 17:10, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. James^x1 2345 17:11, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editing

Rather than adding short essays which are immediately removed, you could look to expand or build upon other articles in a more constructive way. For example, Discrimination against atheists needs badly to be expanded upon (just suggesting something that might appeal.) Many thanks. James^x1 2345 17:14, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Intelligent Design Does Not Meet the Criteria of a Scientific Theory concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Intelligent Design Does Not Meet the Criteria of a Scientific Theory, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:09, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Intelligent Design Does Not Meet the Criteria of a Scientific Theory

Hello Forenglishcomp. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Intelligent Design Does Not Meet the Criteria of a Scientific Theory".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Intelligent Design Does Not Meet the Criteria of a Scientific Theory}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —rybec 03:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]