User talk:Fordiana

Fordiana, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Fordiana! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

"Sir" is a title

Hi there. I just wanted to explain about the reverts I made on your good faith edits. "Sir" is an honorific title used by knighted individuals and baronets. It is not a part of a person's name. A British wikipedian actually corrected one of my edits on this. Most, if not all, prominent pages describing individuals awarded knighthoods, damehoods, etc., adhere to this. ~ Iamthecheese44 (talk) 03:43, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Iamthecheese44 I am not convinced that this is the Wikipedia standard, see e.g. articles like John Key, John Major, Isaac Newton, Paul McCartney, Don Bradman. Another experienced user reverted one of your edits too [1]. You should seek further clarification before making further changes, the fact that you are having to make so many changes is to me evidence that the existing standard is the opposite of what you suggest.

A page you started (Laurie Fitzhardinge) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Laurie Fitzhardinge, Fordiana!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time and trouble to create this - it's appreciated. It's now been reviewed and has had some improvement tags added. If you have the time, could you look it over and see if you can help address any of the issues raised in the tags? Thanks again for your hard work.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 19:34, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fordiana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am requesting for this account to be unblocked so I can resume editing on articles. I acknowledge that it was wrong of me to edit from multiple accounts, and I can see why administrators assumed that I was doing so for bad reasons and chose to block me. I believe that as I did not actually use my multiple accounts for fraudulent / abusive purposes I should be given a second chance. In future I will edit only using this account and I am happy to submit to any checks required to monitor this promise. The areas I would like to work on are Australian history articles, such as completing Draft:Religious Affiliations of Prime Ministers of Australia and creating new articles. I would also like to state that I was not engaging in "paid editing" as one administrator suggested, however, just to be certain in future I will make sure to state if I have any sort of conflict of interest, if it is only perceived. Fordiana (talk) 11:28, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are not eligible for unblock consideration here. Your request must be made on the original account, Marvello123 (talk · contribs). Additionally, you will have to address your undisclosed paid editing. Yamla (talk) 13:14, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:Australian Prime Ministerial Firsts

Hello, Fordiana. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Australian Prime Ministerial Firsts".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 00:37, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Religious Affiliations of Prime Ministers of Australia (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Many unsourced claims and statements, books not properly referenced - which books are being referred to? Book quotes need specific attribution so they can be verified. Otherwise, an extremely good start and will be comfortably accepted when these issues are dealt with.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Religious Affiliations of Prime Ministers of Australia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Religious Affiliations of Prime Ministers of Australia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Drover's Wife (talk) 01:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Religious Affiliations of Prime Ministers of Australia

Hello, Fordiana. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Religious Affiliations of Prime Ministers of Australia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 03:25, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]