User talk:Footballfan145

File copyright problem with File:Erik Hansen.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:Erik Hansen.jpeg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 16:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Erik Hansen.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Erik Hansen.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation of https://www.thetelegraph.com/sports/article/battlehawks-set-xfl-scoring-record-53-28-win-17912567.php and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 16:23, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have permission from the XFL to use this image Footballfan145 (talk) 16:30, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Footballfan145 see the line in my message above where it states, If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 16:40, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are there any images online that can be added to the page without going through that process? Footballfan145 (talk) 16:47, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erik Hansen (football) (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://uiupeacocks.com/sports/football/roster/erik-hansen/6220. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Erik Hansen (football) may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bogger (talk) 08:57, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Footballfan145! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bogger (talk) 08:57, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Erik Hansen (American football), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 05:19, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To summarize, you can’t add your own commentary to articles. That’s considered orginal research. “Though stats don’t show it…” is precisely the kind of edit that you want to avoid, because everything on Wikipedia needs to be verifiable. If there’s something not explained in stats, you want to cite an impartial observer or an expert. It’s be helpful to find a quote from an analyst or a coach. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 05:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was quoting the article that I cited Footballfan145 (talk) 05:46, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for responding. It's good you cited a source, but I think these edits are problematic:

You copied the phrase ...Erik Hansen, from Upper Iowa, is one of two Battlehawks players coming from Division II programs. verbatim.
The source says: ...while the statistics don't show it, he was heavily involved in the pass rush.
You wrote: He was heavily involved in their pass rush although statistic don't show it.

The first is just copy-paste. The second is such a close paraphrasing that most people would consider it a copyright infringement, because you used the same phrasing and simply switched the order. It's important to use your own words on Wikipedia. The writing styles in news articles and columns are different from encyclopedic style, and as an editor, you have to take the facts, but not the phrasing used in articles you're sourcing from. Also, neither sentence conveys anything particularly useful. Is it interesting that the Battlehawks had two D2 athletes? Sure. Is it particularly notable? Not really, especially since the writer doesn't even mention the other player. The involvement in the pass rush that the stats don't show? That could be notable, but without much more information, it's just one writer's observation and the reader's understanding isn't really enhanced. I'd find a better source to convey that information.

Okay, so here's the tricky part. While you want to use your own words, you also don't want to go too far and insert your own commentary or analysis. That can be a tough balance, but it's something that'll improve as you contribute to more articles. And that's something I recommend. Starting new articles from scratch is hard, so you might want to start with making small updates and corrections to existing articles. And [[Wikipedia:Good_articles/Sports_and_recreation#Football|check out articles that have been rated "Good Article"] and see how they're written.

Again, thank you for responding and good luck! Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 14:14, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you for the insight! Feel free to add any other information as you see fit. Thanks Footballfan145 (talk) 20:10, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]