User talk:Fooladin

Welcome!

Hello, Fooladin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Aucaman^Talk 23:54, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RLiT

I wouldn't get too excited there. Wikipedia requires that statements, such as the one you're arguing for, need a reference check from an online, or textual source (or whatever). You can't just put something in and say "Oh! It's true because I'm arguing it is! The whole world is proof!" Simply find something that says it hasn't been popular with Iranians (that has some credibility, I might add), and it'll be perfectly acceptable to put in. Otherwise, it stands as is. Also, the quote needs a citation as well.

--Yossarian 01:25, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Doroud

Hi and Happy Norouz. I see you are from Ardebil, I did some exapnsion to Ardebil's page, Could you please check it and see whether I've missed anything ? Best wishes. Amir85 08:04, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

U Chicago

We should be spreading this news across the internet, not just here on WP.

I'll contact some media people I know and let them know about this.--Zereshk 06:14, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Religion and modernity.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Religion and modernity.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:05, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Chained Murders of Iran, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. LibLord 20:38, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Khatami's reforms

Hi. Mohammad Khatami's reforms has been unprotected. Your help in improving the article will be very much appreciated. Thanks. Barnetj 15:46, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please help in the problem we are facing in this article. with User:patchouli. thanks. Monfared 19:13, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Mina_Bissell.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mina_Bissell.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:21, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

category:Islam and women

As I mentioned in edit commens, which you chose to ignore (and you also chose to ignore the description of the category as well), this category is not for "women by religion". This category is about women interacting with Islam. Most definitely Iran is an Islamic country, and how women fare in Iran is a relevant issue to this category. But I am not going to argue with you, since I have no desire to fight wikipedian cliques who think own a certain topic and nothing can be done without their approval. Allah is patient. Mukadderat 05:43, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

answred in my talk. Mukadderat 17:24, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blame

Salam. Patchuli has claimed that you are sockpuppet.[1]--Sa.vakilian 08:22, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tajiki Persian girls.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Tajiki Persian girls.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Tajiki Persian girls.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

This image, dubiously claiming to be 'traditional' dress, has now been cleared out of all pages. It ought to be deleted at this point.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Tajiki Persian girls.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:30, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Arian-Aftab-gardoon-album.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Arian-Aftab-gardoon-album.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:DHDC.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:DHDC.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:01, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Arian-Aftab-gardoon-album.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Arian-Aftab-gardoon-album.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:46, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Religion and modernity.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Religion and modernity.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Soraya Sepahpour

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Soraya Sepahpour, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Soraya Sepahpour seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Soraya Sepahpour, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 02:30, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rafsanjani

Please discuss on the Talk page of this particular article, and try to reach a consensus before removing any sourced statements. I believe my additions were well-sourced and will revert any unilateral removals unless consensus is reached on the Talk page to remove them. Also note that the New York Times is considered a reliable source. Adlerschloß (talk) 22:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The New York Times article, which is an analysis of Rafsanjani's recent statements and also his political past, specifically notes how capital punishment was applied against dissidents during his time in power. To the author of this article, which appeared in a credible newspaper, this was seen as an important aspect of Rafsanjani's presidency and worthy of mention. We can note that even in events when a president may not have been the one directly applying power, the president still can be responsible for certain relevant appointments. In the contexts of U.S. politics, we would commonly mention controversial policies implemented by a Justice Department under a president's authority in an article concerning a relevant president. Iran's constitutional system is complex and includes a very complicated balance of power, but my understanding is that the President of Iran is ultimately the figure responsible for selecting the Justice Minister, who is responsible for prosecuting government cases. In any event, I do agree that the lead now is balanced, but also believe that this information is worthy of inclusion in the article -- I'll move it from the article's lead and include it specifically in the section below on Rafsanjani's presidency. This was seen as noteworthy enough to be listed in the New York Times article as a display of Rafsanjani's political past, and seems well worth noting here. Adlerschloß (talk) 22:57, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When is it appropriate to change "Farsi" to "Persian"?

Back in July you changed some instances of "Farsi" to "Persian", without making any attempt to explain why you did so. In the (first?) instance I caught you did so without replying to my comment from when I reverted an earlier attempt to change "Farsi" to "Persian" in Ilkham Turdbyavich Batayev.

Perhaps there are well respected linguists who would argue the term "Farsi" should be deprecated, and that "Persian" should always be used instead. Even if that were true, our source document uses "Farsi", and I think that is sufficient reason to follow their lead.

I am very disappointed that you made this change without explanation, or without replying to my earlier comment on the talk page.

Oh, hold the presses, here is another instance where you made this change without explanation... and another, and another, and another, and antoher, and another.

I am going to change back your edit to Ilkham Turdbyavich Batayev. I am going to suggest that you return to the talk pages of the other articles, and explain why you made the change. Geo Swan (talk) 17:52, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sohrabaarabi.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Sohrabaarabi.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Razghandi (talk) 16:30, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hamid Reza Namazi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hamid Reza Namazi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. دالبا (talk) 01:51, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Shakila.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shakila.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 03:23, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Mina Bissell.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mina Bissell.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Tajiki Persian girls.jpg

The file File:Tajiki Persian girls.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]