User talk:FooberFan77

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

July 2021

Thank you for contributing to the article Labrador Retriever. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Cavalryman (talk) 13:47, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Cavalryman: That was not my own website, it was indeed a blog but a blog which is written by Pippa Mattinson who is the best selling author of The Happy Puppy Handbook,

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FooberFan77 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account was blocked eight hourse ago for being a suspected sockpuppet of S826. But it's interesting to note that there is not even a single similiarity between me and long line S826 socks. We have entirely different area of interests as i largely edits on dog related articles apart from mere 1 edit we have entirely different area of interest, editing habits etc. So It's my humble request to a administraitor (other than these one who blocked me) to have a good look at it and unblock my account as there is not even a single similarity between me and the socks. Therefore, the block is not needed any more. FooberFan77 (talk) 00:21, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Based on the SPI, I do not believe you. 331dot (talk) 01:01, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot: Oh really ??? How you think so ???? It's funny how vandals and worst abusers on internet became Wikipedia administraitor. Still, can you point out how I match S826 anyway ??? FooberFan77 (talk) 03:03, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FooberFan77 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked few hours back for being a sock of S826, I posted unblock request but it was declined again by hateful admin by giving a stupid decline reason. I again request a polite and honest admin to take a look at my case again as my topic of interset is entirely different from this guy and his long list of socks. (apart from one topic) Everything is different including edit summaries. Thus, Please take a look again and unblock my account.FooberFan77 (talk) 03:07, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock. Appeal on your main account. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:24, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

UTRS 45355

UTRS appeal #45355 is now closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:19, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]