User talk:Foo Bar Buzz Netz

prior accounts

Are you really going to make me go through the trouble of figuring out which account is yours? Im sure you already know I aint exactly bad at doing so. nableezy - 17:56, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't I save you the trouble? Simply contact User:FT2, who not only knows who I am, but also confirmed, via Check User, that Ceedjee=Noisetier. He then proceeded to warn Ceedjee/Noistier/Alithien that he must either disclose his previous account name(s), or, if he wants to make a clean start, leave the topic area. He also told him if he does neither, he'll be blocked - which is where we are at today. I'm sure FT2 will be happy to confirm this. Then, if you are the principled editor you pretend to be, you can carry on and seek the block or ban of this block-evading user and his various IPs, while I fade back into oblivion.

Or, if you're the two-bit POV-pushing, wikilawyering SPA that we both know you are, you can run away and pretend this little conversation never happened, while you continue with your hypocritical attempts to get the opposing POV banned. Foo Bar Buzz Netz (talk) 21:38, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, Im just going to spend the time determining whuch banned account you are (though I have an idea, thanks for that hint) and making sure your POV-pushing, wikilawyering SP account is blocked. nableezy - 16:06, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, no big surprise here. We both know you don't give a hoot about socking, so long as it comes from YOUR side. So long, hypocrite. Foo Bar Buzz Netz (talk) 23:36, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You think there is an equivalence between an editor blocked at their own request (no other account of this editor is blocked here as far as I can tell) editing as an IP and a multiple times banned editor continuing years of (I cant give an honest description of what you do here, so the rest of the sentence is left to the imagination of the reader). An editor that gets his rocks off harassing a certain Palestinian woman and trying, comically, to seek enforcement of the others bans while himself being banned? And you call me a hypocrite? Thank you. nableezy - 01:40, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are valid reasons for suppressing the earlier names of that user which you don't know about. I will block you if you expose that again. You can file SPI's regarding an IP or new account if you like, but this is your only notice that again posting the equation between two former accounts I am just about to expunge will be considered outing. Zero^talk 15:51, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NoCal100 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page.

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Magnonimous. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 13:39, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that this block is due to it being confirmed that Foo Bar Buzz Netz controlled Anguished56. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 13:39, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]