User talk:Folvil
Speedy deletion nomination of Back to Whitechapel
[edit]Hello Folvil,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Back to Whitechapel for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Makro (talk) 18:10, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Back to Whitechapel for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Back to Whitechapel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Back to Whitechapel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 12:42, 22 November 2013 (UTC)