User talk:Foiled circuitous wanderer
Welcome!
[edit]I am trying to comment on a revision to the page for Maria Sybilla Merian. Even though I have edited this page previously, and am in good standing, the website is denying me access.
Foiled circuitous wanderer!
Foiled circuitous wanderer (talk) 14:45, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Foiled circuitous wanderer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 09:36, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: John Hellins (entomologist) has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
TeaDrinker (talk) 13:51, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Thanks!
[edit]Thanks for your email! The image on my user page is a favorite of mine as well, it is a plate from Ernst Haeckel's beautifully illustrated Kunstformen der Natur. If I can help at all with editing, particularly the technical side of things, do feel free to send me a note. The easiest way to get in touch with me is on my talk page User talk:TeaDrinker. Thanks again and best wishes! --TeaDrinker (talk) 01:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 8
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maria Sibylla Merian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watsonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 19
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Moths and Butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Foiled circuitous wanderer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for January 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pablo Neruda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Batavia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 5
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Walter Kistler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Redmond (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 29
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Sutherland Elton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Smyth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 28
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Double Geneva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Lists
[edit]Hi, I don't wish to be harsh, specially with newer editors, but we really don't need to have articles filled with lists. The process goes like this: an author describes a topic, and mentions it can be found in species A and B. Another editor supposes another example is needed, and amends it to A, B, and C. A third editor notes that his favourite group isn't covered, and amends it to A, B, C, and D1, D2, D3, and D4. A student in a class with a Wikipedia project task then adds "and also in Nanowormioides unimportantissimus"[4][5][6][7][8]", thus gaining a mark for managing to insert a fact in an existing article without being detected by the Vandalism Patrol. And, yup, suddenly we have a ***LIST*** slap bang in the middle of what was briefly a well-written article.
So, what to do. I think it makes sense to have a 'Taxonomic range' section in something like Lek mating, with the clear understanding that a list is basically an accretion (yeah, we call it "list-cruft") of random stuff selected on the basis of goodness-knows-what criteria (big, fierce, hairy, and stings a lot, probably) rather than anything more scientific. Perhaps a tree will make better sense - it's less of a "cruft magnet", and easier to appreciate (and less tediously repetitive). You didn't notice, by the way, that Ghost moth was already in the ever-expanding ... which is exactly how it always goes. So, a tree it will be. Hey ho. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:10, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for January 1
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Snow Queen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frozen.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 28
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Patrick Matthew, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Errol.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Edith Sitwell
[edit]Regarding her Catholicism, Sitwell's conversion is well-documented. Regardless of how devout she was or wasn't, she definitely counts as a English Catholic poet. The Oxford DNB doesn't give much detail, but does say that she filled a "spiritual void" in her life in accepting the Catholic faith; and also mentions that her funeral service was ecumenical, with both a Catholic priest and an Anglican vicar - so certainly there is nothing to suggest that she had ceased being Catholic. In any event, the dead do not control what is done with their funerals. Gabrielthursday (talk) 21:13, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for May 14
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ralph Allan Sampson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Sampson.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Gmelin
[edit]On my user page you wrote:
- Hello: I would like to check your awarding of German citizenship to Gmelin. By my reckoning he was born a citizen of the Holy Roman Empire, and spent his active life within German principalities, none of which was actually "Germany". Did "Germany" not exist before ca 1870?. Cordially Foiled circuitous wanderer (talk) 13:16, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
I agree, and in general I would like to get rid of citizenship and nationality entries altogether. When I think it is obvious (for example, someone born lived, worked and died in the same country) I just delete it. In other cases I leave it to avoid too much argument. In the case of Gmelin I think the information was there before I touched the various Gmelin articles, but maybe I'm wrong. Anyway, I won't complain if you just delete it. Athel cb (talk) 08:51, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 3
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Benjamin Carpenter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingsdown.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 3
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hans Werner Henze, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ondine.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:12, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 14
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hepialidae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lek.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 21
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hepialidae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pallas.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 25
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fanny Mendelssohn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newbury.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Hummingbird hawk-moth
[edit]Hi! I'm posting this here in response to your message inquiring about an edit I made to the page hummingbird hawk-moth, and whether overwintering was mentioned in the source. According to the source I used, "Record summer for ‘hummingbirds’ in UK gardens", it explicitly states that "The influx probably has its origins in the current long spell of warm, southerly winds that carry the moths north from their Mediterranean strongholds. There is also a possibility that rising temperatures mean a growing number are able to overwinter in the UK: in suitable conditions, Hummingbird Hawkmoths will spend the colder months tucked away in thick vegetation, a tree hollow or even a garden shed." I've also moved the message from my userpage to my talk page, as it appears you edited my userpage in error. --BrayLockBoy (talk) 15:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Was Gmelin a citizen of the Holy Roman Empire
[edit]For Smasongarrison Hello there: please take this as a friendly enquiry. You've reclassified Gmelin as being not a citizen of the Holy Roman Empire. We (me and another guy) a year or two back agreed that he wasn't a citizen of Germany--a country that didn't exist in his day--but could usefully be described as a citizen of the Holy Roman Empire. Whch if you check up the dates for the Empire he would have been by date, and if you check up where he was born and died (Tubigen) he must have been by geography.
Best regards Foiled circuitous wanderer (talk) 13:25, 20 August 2024 (UTC)