User talk:Foggas
Foggas, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
|
Hi Foggas!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there! This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:38, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
|
Criticism of Islam
[edit]You made is post at User talk:Septate
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Criticism of Islam, you can get blocked from editing without further notice. Foggas (talk) 05:23, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Septate's edit was not vandalism, and it is uncivil to describe it as such.
What we have is a content dispute. Please could one of you create a new section in the article talk page and discuss it. Septate has made important points in his/her edit summaries. In the talk page, these points could be expanded on, and Foggas could explain why he/she thinks these points are not relevant (or whatever Foggas's disagreement is).--Toddy1 (talk) 09:14, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Please consider this as a warning. You are engaged in an edit war over the article on Criticism of Islam. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Below is a list of the four/five reverts that each of you have made.
1. Septate 11:00, 23 March 2014
1. Froggas 11:36, 23 March 2014
2. Septate 16:40, 25 March 2014
2. Froggas 17:18, 25 March 2014
3. Septate 14:11, 26 March 2014
3. Froggas 18:40, 26 March 2014
4. Septate 15:52, 28 March 2014
4. Froggas 05:27, 29 March 2014
5. Septate 16:13, 29 March 2014
Wikipedia has a policy on edit warring. Please use the section at Talk:Criticism of Islam#Edits by Froggas to discuss this issue, and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in this edit war, you may be blocked from editing.--Toddy1 (talk) 17:50, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
December 2018
[edit]
Your recent editing history at Criticism of Islam shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 14:21, 31 December 2018 (UTC)