User talk:Fogelmanis
Welcome
[edit]
|
The article Vivian Full has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:10, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Vivian Full
[edit]The article Vivian Full has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Sourced only to IMDB.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Adam9007 (talk) 00:30, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Vivian Full for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vivian Full is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivian Full until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - MrX 12:23, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
November 2016
[edit]
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivian Full. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Don't delete other people's comments in a discussion, make your own case Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:36, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Vivian Full. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges.
Further the sources you are trying to use are pure WP:NOTRS, and cannot be used on a WP:Biography of living persons article. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:33, 13 November 2016 (UTC)