User talk:Focak

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Focak! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Marek.69 ^talk 04:28, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note regarding Naples

Thanks for the note regarding the population of Naples on huwiki! It has been a while since it was updated! I checked the data and it is correct as you say, it has been corrected! The problem is updating on huwiki, because there are only a few editors who are working on Italian cities, so mostly the population data is from the 2001 census. Many thanks again! --Istvánka (talk) 07:11, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Napoli

Ciao, ti do ragione ma infatti mi sono solo limitato ad affiancare i dati OCSE agli altri già presenti (in più ho messo i dati dell'area urbana che è un'altra cosa e ho risistemato la grammatica)! Infatti anche secondo me l'area metropolitana di Napoli è più grande, però tieni presente che io preferisco usare l'OCSE perchè è l'unico ente che mette Milano a 7.4 milioni di abitanti, cioè la sua vera cifra, quindi non mi sembra campanilista e per Torino e Roma secondo me è abbastanza attendibile. Per questo poi mi sentivo in dovere di citare l'OCSE anche nelle altre città. Come mai ti sembra campanilista (al di là di Napoli voglio dire)? Saluti.

--Conte di Cavour (talk) 12:42, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scusami l'ho tolto perchè tu avevi scritto una cosa come "mega lombard region" ma correggimi se sbalgio, cosa che sinceramente non credo sia comprensibile dal pubblico inglese-americano vista anche la mancanza di link interni a quella voce (poi anche io non ho capito cosa voglia dire e che differenza ci sia con area metropolitana milanese), quindi penso che sia più facile lasciare "Milan metropolitan area". Iin realtà il discorso è anche più ampio se vogliamo, perchè il punto è che in Italia non esistono stastistiche certe dell'Istat (come dovrebbe) sulle aree metropolitane come negli USA e in altri paesi europei, quindi è veramente problematico trattare questo tipo di dati e ogni tanto spuntano valutazioni di vari enti o università tutte diverse tra loro per metodologia (come avrai tu stesso visto tra fonte del CENSIS e l'altro studio indipendente che però non ha l'autorevolezza di una fonte come il CENSIS o l'Istat). Per questo ho ritenuto di usare fonti internazionali e le uniche che ho trovato di enti seri (non quelle classifiche fai da te che ci sono in giro in rete) sono per le aree urbane l'Urban Audit dell'UE, che però ha dati vecchi di 10 anni, e per le aree metropolitane l'OCSE. Ma ovviamente se se ne trovano di meglio sarà doveroso sostituirli. Scusa la lunghezza e ti assicuro che non volevo inficiare il tuo lavoro, ho solo voluto affiancare la fonte internazionale che avevo messo in tutte le pagine a quelle che hai messo tu. A presto.

--Conte di Cavour (talk) 20:56, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please read: Talk:Naples#City_and_metropolitan_area. This is international sources and data. Naples is not Europe's largest city on the Mediterranean coast, both in terms of the city population (0.9 million on Naples and 1.6 million on Barcelona), urban/metropolitan area/agglomeration and area city (Naples with 117.3 km2, example Marseille with 240.62 km2). You are merely local patriot, if you do not stop I notification to the administrator. Inter-man (talk) 09:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, there are many sources about metropolitan area but Barcelona is Europe's largest city on the Mediterranean coast. Officially living in the city 1.6 million people. In the article does not write the "largest metropolitan area", but the "city". You no longer have discuss, this discussion is closed. Inter-man (talk) 12:20, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not intend to discuss with you. You can not understand, the "metropolitan area" is colloquial term, exist are many sources about metropolitan area representing different of numbers. However the city is the official data. Therefore, I never written "largest metropolitan area". Barcelona is Europe's largest city on the Mediterranean coast. Officialy in city of Barcelona lives 1.6 million peoples. Of course, you're trying any tricks (area of city, metropolitan area, now Rome). What a tricks come up tomorrow? Rome is not lie on the Mediterranean coast, lie 24 km from sea. My edition is based on official data, officialy in city of Barcelona lives 1.6 million peoples. In article write "Barcelona is Europe's largest city on the Mediterranean coast". Everything is correct. If I had write "Barcelona is Europe's largest metropolitan area on the Mediterranean coast", I understand the concerns. Exist are many sources about metropolitan area representing different of numbers. As for the city is the official data. If you do not stop erased data from article I notification to the administrator. Inter-man (talk) 10:00, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Barcelona. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Nja²⁴⁷ 18:09, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Naples

(Qui bisogna parlare inglese) It's not censorship. Your addition was rather useless and also violated WP:Weasel words and WP:POV. Add sources for questionable statements. Further, do not use "it's", "don't" and similar contracted forms in encyclopedical content. Ciao e buon lavoro. --'''Attilios''' (talk) 19:24, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Surely I respect you but please keep respecting rules. A note: imagine you are a reader from Burkina Faso. For sure it won't be obvious that Naples is a major city. So add everything which could look a personal judgement with a source. Also remember that here the principle is to leave the reader to decide by himself if something is big, major, important etc. by reading the article itself. Ciao e buon lavoro... --'''Attilios''' (talk) 08:14, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have not understand Wikipedia at all and keep not respecting its rules (for example not writing in English in talk pages); plus, I see you've been just involved in an edit war which exactly reflects the profile I got of you from your posts. When you will reach a knowledge of its functionalities, and all the rewards I've been given here in expanding and carefully caring Italian articles, we can speak again. Ciao. --'''Attilios''' (talk) 16:45, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]