User talk:Flyingnarb

November 2011

In a recent edit, you changed one or more words from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you.

Stop changing color to colour just because color is not the way you spell the word. Thanks you, you have been warned. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 00:55, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please, when discussing articles,assume good faith, and stick to the discussing topic at hand. You need not address users (accusations of trolling, "you must be new at video game articles", etc.) just the content itself. Thank you. Sergecross73 msg me 16:42, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Second warning: Stop attacking editors. Accusations of trolling, being laughted at expense of the community, etc, are not appropriate. (And on a side note, they don't work either. People see through empty comments such as that.) Argue principles, don't resort to petty claims. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 01:57, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Universal acclaim

It is clear from your comments at Talk:The Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword#Reception section - "Universal acclaim" that you cannot be convinced that your opinion is incompatible with Wikipolicy. It is also fairly clear from your comments that you refuse to compromise. Please answer the following question:

Would you, Flyingnarb, be willing to abide by the ruling of an informal mediation?

I have asked you this 4 times now. Please respond to that question and that question alone. -Thibbs (talk) 15:50, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RfC Filing

Hi Flyingnarb. I've filed an RfC for the Universal Acclaim issue that we've been debating for ~6 weeks. You can find it here. I'm sorry that we couldn't come to a compromise but I hope that we can resolve the issue quickly. -Thibbs (talk) 16:36, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]