User talk:FlwrLeis

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added such as to the page REO Speedwagon do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Smashville^talk 19:32, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kevin Beamish

A tag has been placed on Kevin Beamish requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Htmnssn (talk) 23:24, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Boucherbeamish, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you created appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been deleted for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of deletion, you might like to draft your article before submission, then get me or any other editor to proofread it. To start creating a draft article, just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit that page as you would any other. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that if more than one person is using this account to edit, then unfortunately it will be blocked from editing.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! PGWG (talk) 16:12, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Boucherbeamish! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 43 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Kevin Beamish - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:50, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Jesse L. Boucher

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because it did not meet one or more of our policies. Feel free to read more there, or contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Josve05a (talk) 16:03, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Identity theft is a form of stealing someone's identity in which someone pretends to be someone else by assuming that person's identity, usually as a method to gain access to resources or obtain credit and other benefits in that person's name.[1][2] The victim of identity theft (here meaning the person whose identity has been assumed by the identity thief) can suffer adverse consequences if they are held responsible for the perpetrator's actions. Identity theft occurs when someone uses another's personally identifying information, like their name, identifying number, or credit card number, without their permission, to commit fraud or other crimes. The term identity theft was coined in 1964;[3] however, it is not literally possible to steal an identity — less ambiguous terms are identity fraud or impersonation — terms which tend less toward emplacement of onus upon the impersonated person and which tend more toward emplacement properly of the onus upon the victim and the perpetrator of fraud.

We are in a dispute legally, and this information was not accurate. It would be best to delete the entire page, however, I have tried to edit to create the accurate information. This information posted here, has allowed others to hack into business accounts. (FlwrLeis (talk) 01:47, 8 July 2015 (UTC))[reply]

March 2013

Hello, I'm Josve05a. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Sherry Boucher because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Josve05a (talk) 16:05, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jesse L. Boucher. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Josve05a (talk) 16:11, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My family has experienced identity theft and a stalker has been putting information up that is causing us great legal problems. No one has the right to put up an entire history on me or my family.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Sherry Boucher with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. 10metreh (talk) 16:21, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Sherry Boucher. 10metreh (talk) 16:31, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 16:54, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm JJMC89. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Jesse L. Boucher without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 00:48, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Savannah Smith Boucher. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 00:52, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Winner 42 Talk to me! 03:23, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]