User talk:Fluffykin1

July 2015

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Vitamin Well— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:42, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vitamin Well with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:48, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Vitamin Well with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ~ Rob^Talk 21:59, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Calgary has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Calgary was changed by Fluffykin1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955342 on 2018-10-17T00:49:46+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:49, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Airdrie, Alberta, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:06, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Baitun Nur Mosque, you may be blocked from editing. What you are doing is very unhelpful: changing those names means the images and articles aren't properly linked. And at any rate this is a big change, unverified and without much warranty--seek consensus on talk page. Drmies (talk) 01:14, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well if they are not properly linked do as you see fit.

Baitun Nur Dispute

Hello Dremies I am not wrong at all and please stop black mailing me. We can negotiate like normal human beings if you want to.

There is no dispute, and I am not blackmailing you. I am telling you that if you do this again I will block you because it is so inept. I mean, in your haste to rename the mosque you even retitle the articles that are cited, which is ridiculous. And that's before the matter that you change the theology in a little edit--that's for the talk page. Drmies (talk) 01:27, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok well Im new here... is this how you treat a new wikipedian?

Your latest edit made hash of the article format. Please stop. Acroterion (talk) 01:46, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you're new in a place, and you piss on the rug cause it looks like a toilet, and someone asks you not do do that, and you do it again, and you get told off, do you have a right to complain? Drmies (talk) 01:54, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]