User talk:Floyd2009
|
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]Hello Floyd2009! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 232 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Dory Maust - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:28, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Dory Maust
[edit]The article Dory Maust has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- BLP with no evidence of notability: refs are to subject's own website (apparently defunct) and Amazon page for her book. Several external links dead, others to obvious press releases. Also rather promotional in tone.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 11:44, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Blood Stained: When No One Comes Looking for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blood Stained: When No One Comes Looking until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.