User talk:Flowervr
June 2011
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Flower essences has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Razor2988 (talk) 22:01, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Flowervr/sandbox (June 3)
[edit]
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Flowervr/sandbox.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Nikki Gregoroff (June 5)
[edit]Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nikki Gregoroff.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
In response to your email (next time leave something on my talk page please? Is a lot easier to find you)
[edit]I hate to be brutally honest, but the process you have yet to undergo is the most important process, and in the past other authors have had to recreate their entire article to meet proper citation rules.
The article itself looks okay, but it lists no sources. There are no reasons that would lead us to believe that the subject deserves it's own Wikipedia article. As a living person, we run the extra risk of unsourced things being false. This is very bad, and has led to legal troubles in the past. So, we need inline citations to support the article. Since there is nothing blatantly controversial in the article, citing third party coverage when your subject has made a notable achievement, or leaving a citation at the end of most paragraphs will suffice. It's very important that the citation is supporting (though not explicitly saying word for word because that's plagarism) the point you're trying to make.
I have done you the courtesy of adding in a references section and a {{reflist}} template, however you must find the sources yourself.
This is a difficult process, but there are several sources and people to offer guidance. Good luck! I hope to be able to accept your article when it next passes through AfC! hewhoamareismyself 18:00, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Nikki Gregoroff (June 6)
[edit]Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nikki Gregoroff.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! Flowervr,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
|
undefined
Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question aboutDraft:Nikki Gregoroff
[edit]
Hello, Flowervr! I'm Bellerophon. I have replied to your question on the Articles for Creation Help DeskaboutDraft:Nikki Gregoroff. You can read the reply at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#Review of Draft:Nikki Gregoroff. Bellerophon talk to me 19:13, 6 June 2014 (UTC) Bellerophon talk to me 19:13, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: You've got messages!
[edit]
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 22:01, 6 June 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Draft:Nikki Gregoroff concern
[edit]Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nikki Gregoroff, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Nikki Gregoroff
[edit]
Hello, Flowervr. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Nikki Gregoroff".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Nikki Gregoroff}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:01, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
I've made a couple of tweaks for you. She does look thoroughly notable, but to avoid it being instantly targeted for deletion when it moves across to article space, you must include some references from reliable sources. --Dweller (talk) 09:15, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- On reflection, this looks like a stale draft. I'm inclined to take it to WP:MFD, given what I see above and in the page history. --Dweller (talk) 09:48, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Nikki Gregoroff concern
[edit]Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nikki Gregoroff, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 30 May 2016 (UTC)