User talk:Flowerheaven

Welcome!

Hello, Flowerheaven, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Chris (talk) 13:04, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Springer COI

Hello Flowerheaven,

Your edits mostly consist of adding "Further reading" or "External links" for recent, or current springer/springer-verlag publications. I have reverted your recent edits, as they seem to consist mainly of promoting material rather than actual page improvement. Before adding such references, please consider taking the familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's conflict of interest and related external link policies, which may have some bearing in this situation. Regards User A1 (talk) 13:21, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article on Springer science+ Business is not meant to be a list of all journals published by that company whcih have articles here. This should be handled by a category. FPlease find out how to do it right. On what basis are you including the selected journals and series? What I think you might do, is include those of the longest existence, as one group, and those in the top 5% of the ISI JCR category in another. As for the series, it is highly inappropriate to include ones without WP articles in a list of this sort, and I have removed them. I remind you again about WP:COI, and advise a careful reading of our FAQ about businesses, other organisations, and articles like these. And a good look at the archives of the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Academic Journals -- or the discussions about academic journals on my own subject talk page archive, about Journals, both general and specific questions DGG (talk) 04:51, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

One or more portions of material you added to Hydrogeology Journal duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.iah.org/. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 22:56, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Science Bulletin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Science Bulletin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Science Bulletin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]