User talk:FlowerSniffer

Skins

Why did you undo a edit to make the page worse. Red links mean that there is no page for it to link to, so they should be removed. [1] Russell >: 4 8 15 16 23 42 20:38, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neither Scarlet or Sketch (unless he's the gay chav) have definitely appeared in episode one. What's the link for the press statement? ~Zythe^{Talk to me!} 22:26, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scarlett (TV character)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Scarlett (TV character), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Scarlett (TV character). Dicklyon (talk) 16:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Middleweight designer

The article Middleweight designer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is unsourced. Wikipedia is not a dictionary of occupational terms anyway.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Beeblebrox (talk) 10:23, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mac Operator for deletion

The article Mac Operator is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mac Operator until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jeepday (talk) 00:27, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]