User talk:FleetCommand is a Doroogh Goo

December 2017

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 13:42, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Canvassing by FleetCommand

@Jeh: You should be aware that the message FleetCommand left on your talk page is a clear cut case of canvassing. He is obviously asking you because he expects you to support his and Codename Lisa’s point of view and gang up with them against the other editor. Also, FleetCommand is currently topic banned from Manual of Style related articles and discussions which have tangently come up in the talk page discussion that he canvassed you to join. FleetCommand is a Doroogh Goo (talk) 20:15, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of ANI thread

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:FleetCommand is a Doroogh Goo - inappopriate use of talk page while blocked. Jeh (talk) 20:29, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]