User talk:FlawlessViper

Please assume good faith

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Randy Orton. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Papacha (talk) 13:00, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree with you that Orton's suffered a legitimate injury, please don't blow up at your fellow editors and assume they're "idiots", it's not uncommon for injury storylines to be written to explain someone's absence from the ring. The other guy's in the wrong too, but just carry on through and provide valid links for verification beyond reasonable doubt to prove your case. Also - you're probably better off using f4wonline or the Torch as a reference resource; sescoops isn't considered a trusted one and WWE.com's been known to fabricate stories (Jericho "head-kick" injury from EC; AJ's laundry list of maladies from Big Show) as mentioned previously. Papacha (talk) 13:00, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Refer to the 23 Feb. 2012 note above. Ditto while describing your edits. Don't be a dick. Thanks. Nhprman 20:59, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Week 11 Colts-Pats Game

Hi there. Please see the bottom of the press release at http://www.cbspressexpress.com/cbs-sports/releases/view?id=33489 - CBS apparently knew about the 4:25 Eastern time change for Colts/Pats before the NFL announced it, but still listed Harlan/Wilcots for the game. I have not yet seen a newer press release on http://www.cbspressexpress.com/cbs-sports/releases saying that they have switch Nantz-Simms to the game. Just because a Sunday afternoon is flex, it does not necessarily mean that the number 1 broadcast team for that network will call that game. I can give you a few examples of this over the past few seasons. Once they post a new "NFL on CBS Audibles" press release updating the announcers, we can update it accordingly. Remember, content on Wikipedia is determined by previously published information rather than by the personal beliefs or experiences of its editors. Regards. Zzyzx11 (talk) 06:54, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scott MacDonald (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NCIS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:33, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of WWE Champions, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — Richard BB 06:06, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at The Shield (professional wrestling), you may be blocked from editing. STATic message me! 04:46, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add false protection templates to articles such as you did with List of World Heavyweight Champions (WWE). Your edits have been undone. If you wish to have an article protected, you must make a request at WP:RPP. — Richard BB 11:29, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John Cena. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. CRRays Head90 | ^#OneMoreGame 07:43, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STATic message me! 21:03, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to John Cena, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. COMMENT: The nickname itself has a reliable source. I am further trying to explain what this term means on the talk page. Please go there to discuss further instead of reverting. Antoshi ☏ ★ 05:04, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Authority (professional wrestling), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. STATic message me! 19:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 3MB (professional wrestling team) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Abir 11:35, 15 February 2014 (UTC) [reply]

Misunderstanding and has been rectified. Issue was another user reverting this user's edits. My apologies, Viper. Warning revoked. Abir 11:35, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to List of World Heavyweight Champions (WWE), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Vjmlhds 11:59, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Main event matches

Like I said in my edit summary, I wasn't sure how many main events there were, so I guessed it was three. When I read the Main event article, it said "Sometimes, multiple matches of equally high importance take place on a card, occasionally at intervals throughout (to sustain spectator interest for its duration) but generally at the end in succession." From that, I inferred that the Divas match was not a main event (and I think every WWE fan would agree). Antoshi ☏ ★ 23:20, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm Vjmlhds. I noticed that you made a comment on the page List of WWE personnel that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vjmlhds 17:37, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Number 1 don't be so rude unless you want me to report you for personal attacks (it's not the first time you have been warned) and second if you made sure you always sourced your work, used edit summaries and the likes there would be no misunderstandings. Lukejordan02 (talk) 03:07, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm Betty Logan. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of highest-grossing films without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Betty Logan (talk) 12:22, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]